|
| |
|  
all, rights, property
(score: 0.911)
|
|
 | | Re: Preaching to the Choir
|
| (...) That's sorta irrelevant-- As I stated elsewhere, yes, I'm all for allowing polygamy, etc (provided some probably some other changes), and all for letting consenting aliens get married if we find any, but that's not the point. The proposed (...) (21 years ago, 11-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.911)
|
|
| | Re: Scans are back!
|
| Hello Larry, hello everybody, (...) I do understand by now what was going on in the last few weeks, and why. However, there hasn't been much response to my second point, which was about Brickshelf L.L.C. claiming all rights with uploaded scans: (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.911)
|
|
| | Re: Scans are back!
|
| (...) That is required to prevent claims from those who submit material to us. It is standard business practice (think of contests where people submit entries). To be clear, yes it does mean that you give up any and all rights to scans you submit to (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.911)
|
|
| | Re: IP ( was Re: LP POINT 1
|
| (...) But what do you think? (...) Oh, I think it's a two way street. That's why there's nothing wrong with it. When you're an employee, you're being exploited because someone is (traditionally) making money from your labor. But you're exploiting (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.911)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts
|
| (...) That is to be expected, and that wasn't the point I was trying to make. I'm not offended by people copying my designs for their own private enjoyment. Suppose LEGO claims rights to any sets you create using their service. Suppose they go on to (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.911)
|
|
| | Re: Authorized Lego retailers
|
| (...) The following text comes directly from an actual Lego Systems, Inc. order invoice/packing slip from March 2003 on a form dated January 1993. Only relevant portions reproduced here exactly as presented on the form; emphasis is exactly as on the (...) (21 years ago, 11-Aug-04, to lugnet.market.theory)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.910)
|
|
| | Re: LP POINT 2
|
| (...) Quick answer, for closure. Under a property rights analysis, there is no right to sustenance, per se. There is a right to offer to trade for or pay for or ask for charitiable sustenance but no requirement that anyone in particular actually (...) (25 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.910)
|
|
| | Re: Preaching to the Choir
|
| (...) One issue at a time, John! If would-be polyandrists wish to marry in groups, let them plead their case. At present the issue pertains to two-party contracts. In any case, I have yet to hear a convincing argument as to why multi-party marriages (...) (21 years ago, 11-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.910)
|
|
| | Re: Preaching to the Choir
|
| (...) Theory is not fact. To extrapolate the worst possible scenario from a report and then state that "the UN has concluded ..." is a lie. (...) Bush is terrorizing the American public to further his personal political agenda. Sounds like (...) (21 years ago, 11-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.910)
|
|
| | Re: Preaching to the Choir
|
| (...) Can I assume that the main knock on defining marriage as the union of 1 woman 1 man is that it discriminates (against gays). But doesn't your proposed definition discriminate against polyspousewanters? Why is your discriminating definition any (...) (21 years ago, 11-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.910)
|
|
| | Re: Preaching to the Choir
|
| (...) No, marriage is often used as a way to avoid deportation, which would be a non-issue if only citizens could get married. I don't believe either party has to be a citizen/national, so that a Canadian and a Mexican could meet up in Vegas on (...) (21 years ago, 11-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.910)
|
|
| | Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
| (...) we (...) Why? Seriously. Is the creation of an individual human life a reasonable analogy? Do you advocate parents having the same rights over their children that you are accepting of your God having over us? (...) I think that creating life (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.909)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.909)
|
|
| | Re: Preaching to the Choir
|
| (...) ...Or that I maintain an open mind, even when I am already fairly convinced of my viewpoint. Are you so arrogant that you believe it is possible for a human being to achieve total, certain understanding of these issues? (...) Listen to (...) (21 years ago, 9-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.909)
|
|
| | Re: Preaching to the Choir
|
| (...) The good word I've always tried to share is that of freedom. Free minds, free markets. The problem is that neither "side"(1) gets it. The Right (that's you, John, and your ilk) wants to take away my personal *rights*. They are busily impinging (...) (21 years ago, 8-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.909)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.909)
|
|
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.909)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.908)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.908)
|
