|
| |
|  
all
(score: 0.920)
|
|
 | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) It also means homosexual in today's context. True it didn't always mean that, but regardless it's a common term nowadays to refer to homosexuals. (...) Well, you can't really sue LUGNET. They already reserved the right to discriminate for any (...) (21 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.920)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.920)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.920)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.920)
|
|
| | Shou shalt not steal?
|
| (...) Think I missed that thread-- But I'm gonna come in late and argue something perhaps a little more basic: Inter-human morality all boils down to: "Thou shalt respect others." Which really works great, I think. "Thou shalt not kill" => "Thou (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.919)
|
|
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) For one thing, I did not commit to refuting this particular point within your basic premise. That was another thread. For another, I said there that I would accept your basic premise that "all rights are property rights" You're trying to turn (...) (26 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.919)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.919)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.919)
|
|
| | Re: Australian Nation Meet, 2005
|
| (...) • There were phone calls to find where we can even hold the event. That took a few calls, I can't remember how many, but I do recall calling several places. There was the badges that I made/paid for, a few things printed out. Basically we got (...) (21 years ago, 29-Aug-04, to lugnet.loc.au)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.919)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.919)
|
|
| | Re: Aust event 2005 (update #1)
|
| (...) That is all fine and stuff, but there is a lot more to it than just finding a place and time. Otherwise we may have a venue, but not the rights to run such an event. It's not a case of just finding a venue and saying it's going to be on this (...) (21 years ago, 11-Sep-04, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.919)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.917)
|
|
| | Re: Preaching to the Choir
|
| (...) Oh, I was just making the terms up, for all I know. I guess I should have explicated. (...) Yes. I see it as a sure-fire loop-hole avoidance scheme. If all property is taxed, regardless of who owns it, then the rich -- even when trying to (...) (21 years ago, 9-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.917)
|
|
| | Re: Arguing about nature, Nature, and ethics
|
| (...) Steve can speak for himself but I think he's responding to me. I've said that I had in the past foundered on trying to derive a justification for natural rights from reasoning about how animals do things and about what evolution has crafted. I (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.917)
|
|
| | Re: LUG creation
|
| Answers based on NELUG. www.nelug.org (...) We started by posting to the local groups that are part of the New England area. Once a couple of people connected we met a couple of times and then decided to form NELUG. (...) Now we usually start at a (...) (21 years ago, 20-Aug-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.917)
|
|
| | Re: Keeping the Peace in Nablus
|
| Hmm, I never knew you were a holocaust denying anti-Semite. As such you clearly have no understanding of the IDF’s (URL) Ethical Standards>: Israel has a principle that weapons and force can only be used for the purpose of a military operation and (...) (21 years ago, 18-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.916)
|
|
| | ENDLESS stinking reminder
|
| (...) Chris said winning the event gives me bragging rights, so I'm using them. So far, in addition to winning rtl-15, my C4 robots have won two "Best Creation" awards, have been on TechTV, and also showed up on the news in Denmark. I was planning (...) (21 years ago, 1-Sep-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.916)
|
|
| | Re: Arguing about nature, Nature, and ethics
|
| (...) Feel free to call me Lar or Larry. (...) No, I don't think this is necessarily true (whether others agree with it or not). I am not a moral relativist. I think there is an objective morality that is proper and good for humans to embrace. I've (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.916)
|
|
| | Re: Arguing about nature, Nature, and ethics
|
| In response to "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> in message news:G5qotE.M0q@lugnet.com... Larry, I appreciate the interaction you've provided. Before going any further, I'm glad that you're not a relativist (which means, in turn, that you (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.916)
|
