LUGNET News : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 601 – 620 of about 136000.

Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: ("life affirming" == "no initiation of force") == "all rigihts are property rights"?
(...) OK, fair enough. Just to be clear, if we posit that there are no property rights, under such a system of rights calculus, it might well be OK for you to walk up to me and rip food out of my hand, food that I traded someone else for, or grew (...) (26 years ago, 9-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 0.924)

		Re: Family values?
(...) The fact that you suggest the self-evidence of marriage indicates that you and I have two fundamentally divergent worldviews. That's fine, of course, but we need to recognize that certain issues are therefore insoluble between us, and this may (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 0.924)

		Re: Louisiana bans gay marriages
(...) To my knowledge, none of them do. Vermont allows same-sex "civil unions" (essentially the same thing as marriage, with all the rights and priveledges thereof, but without the word "marriage" attached), but there was a recent news buzz going (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)

all, rights
(score: 0.924)

		Re: Announcing: Space Wheels Contest
(...) Hehe. The part of Keith 'Smack' Goldman to now be played by Larry 'Smackity' Pieniazek.... ;) All tossing aside, the only stipulation is that at least one wheel be in contact with the ground for the purpose and execution of conveyance through (...) (21 years ago, 1-Oct-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.924)

		Re: Is space property?
Hmm, I've been thinking about this issue since before Chris posted (look back and you'll find a thought exercise of mine dealing with someone living on property which is totally surrounded by someone else's property where that other person decides (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 0.924)

		Re: Is space property?
(...) and (...) will (...) I've been thinking about this. I have at various times thought that rights are: A) immutable truths based on the nature of our humanity, B) make believe, C) legal constructs saying what we can do, and D) fuzzy terms that (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 0.923)

		Uhh, back to tax again ;-) (Was Re: Is space property?)
Christopher Weeks wrote in message ... (...) unfair, (...) You're right. I have made two mistakes in my argument: one was to invoke the ambiguous concept of "fairness", the other one was to rigidly stick to the dictionary definition of "stealing" (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 0.923)

		Re: Lavender Brick Society
It's just too tempting. (...) Nah. They probably think of you as a narrow-minded, bigoted, right-wing, Bible-thumping homophobe because: 1) You seem adamant that everyone who argued against your point is wrong, and is also a hatemonger, solely on (...) (21 years ago, 28-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.923)

		Re: Is space property?
Warning: Long, long rant by the resident imperial historian follows. Grab a donut (or an ear of corn, if you're a Middle American like myself). ;) (...) It doesn't. The lifestyle we enjoy in the US, UK, Europe (as a whole), Japan, Oceania, Canada, (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 0.923)

		Re: Why these news groups were created
(...) That's not how you phrased the point, initially. You presented these actions in the context of a baby's actions, and that's how I addressed them. If you wish to change the question at this time, then you must either address or cede the (...) (21 years ago, 27-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.923)

		OH, I'll reply all right
due to the fact that I find using the web browser awkward, this is my THIRD attempt at typing this reply...... Steve said: (...) its always been: "what the game??" (...) With typical Steve-centric (tm) flare, I could expect something like "...that (...) (21 years ago, 24-Sep-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

all, rights
(score: 0.923)

		Re: Lavender Brick Society
(...) Well, I was not expecting THIS much of a response simply because I said of what I said in my letter. A lot of people must think of me as a narrow-minded, bigoted, right-wing, Bible-thumping homophobe now because I said that it was not a good (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.922)

		Re: Why these news groups were created
(...) Things that are clearly wrong are those things that clearly harm others. Like abuse and neglect of children. Not like consensual sexual activities. Homosexuality isn't right because it's part of society, it's right because no one is harmed. (...) (21 years ago, 24-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.922)

		Re: Why these news groups were created
(...) Sir, I do hate (or strongly dislike) the results of these actions. Can you honestly tell me that you enjoy (or would enjoy) painting over permanent marks on the walls, changing poopy diapers, and scrubbing vomit out of the carpet, in and of (...) (21 years ago, 25-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.922)

		Re: Why these news groups were created
(...) alright, let me throw everything out on the table: i am a Christian conservative. i am pro-family (that is marriage between a man and a woman), pro-life (the right for an unborn, helpless child to live), and i adhere to the best of my ability (...) (21 years ago, 24-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.922)

		Re: Oh no - Crocodile disappeared in S@H / discontinued as trains are not selling?
(...) Hi John, yes we have been part of - what feels today like kind of - the gold-rush times in the LEGO Hobby. The community found together and LEGO as a company realized that there are these so called "AFOLs". And us collecting all information (...) (3 years ago, 4-Jul-22, to lugnet.trains, FTX)

all
(score: 0.921)

		Re: Lavender Brick Society
(...) Well, just in terms of parallel evolution of ideas re: sacred v. profane. And whatever other oddity you'd care to contribute, of course. (...) I do not believe that there are any absolute standards for society, and all standards are determined (...) (21 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.921)

		("life affirming" == "no initiation of force") == "all rigihts are property rights"?
This is the anchor of a new thread to deal with the subject proposition. Posters to this thread will have accepted the first parenthetized equality as true, and will have accepted that humans are life affirming, and that therefore to initiate the (...) (26 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 0.921)

		Re: ("life affirming" == "no initiation of force") == "all rigihts are property rights"?
Hi Guys, This is a good read so far. Thanks. (...) I think the deal is that everything we collectively value about our modern social technology (even if some of us complain about governance) is possible strictly because our systems include an (...) (26 years ago, 9-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 0.921)

		Re: Lavender Brick Society
(...) Oddly, this is straight out of Mircea Eliade's "The Sacred and The Profane," which speaks of the investment of "sacredness" into certain places/customs/actions so that those places/customs/actions are preserved against alteration due to (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.921)

More: Next Page >>