|
 | | Re: Anthony you owe me for this
|
| (...) While I am flattered you took the time to do so, I'm afraid I don't think Lego will produce any of my MOCs. First of all, the Castle Arrandrall and the F'Rekkah Atoll are VERY big, far too big for lego to ever produce and make a profit. I (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jul-02, to lugnet.castle)
| |
|  
all, rights
(score: 0.943)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.942)
|
|
| | Re: The PATRIOT act is a fine law!
|
| (...) Hi Larry, gotta tell you, there are many parts of PAI and PAII I am very unhappy about, as a conservative. While I think it is good for the FBI and CIA to be able to talk with each other regarding terrorism and share info, these sneak and peek (...) (21 years ago, 6-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.941)
|
|
| | Re: A 'possible' LEGOLAND Park in Illinois
|
| (...) And that in no way disproves my thesis. LEGOLAND Billund is a unique property with a long-established history. If TLG headquarters and it's orginal production facilities had not been located there there would be no LEGOLAND Billund. Heck, if (...) (16 years ago, 29-Oct-09, to lugnet.legoland, FTX)
| |
|
property
(score: 0.939)
|
|
| | Re: Color page updated
|
| (...) I'm gonna explain (and quit afterwards) why I hesitate adding new and old - what I call "MLCad" - colors to the LDConfig.ldr file: * The current LDConfig.ldr contains only colors you'll find in official LEGO Bricks (with two exceptions (...) (16 years ago, 6-Dec-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.939)
|
|
| | The Internet (R)*
|
| I thought I would bring this up for discussion here, as the whole lot of us seem to be AT LEAST low-level computer geeks. This is scary: (URL) shows just how scary the above is: (URL) I thought .net was messed up. Now, I'm not one for total (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.939)
|
|
| | Lego to do Jurassic Park III sets
|
| LEGO and Universal Studios Consumer Products Group Announce New Toys Based on JP III. The LEGO Company, makers of the world's best-selling construction toys and Universal Studios Consumer Products Group (USCPG), have joined forces to launch two (...) (25 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.938)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
| (...) Democracy, individual human rights and the concept of "property" are all myths too, and myths with much shorter history in human culture than the idea of a divine creator. They're also less rational than belief in God. If we accept a literal (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.938)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.937)
|
|
| | Re: LGPL Datsville
|
| (...) That would be really cool! Just review them carefully first since I may have made some fatal mistakes, like at the Town Hall. I just corrected one at the Water Tower. I think it was due to the unofficial version of a part was differently (...) (16 years ago, 24-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.937)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.936)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark
|
| (...) From what I recall, LEGO received KiddieCraft bricks in 1947 along with their first molding machine. The bricks were (if I infer correctly) presented to LEGO as examples of what can be done with plastic injection molding. LEGO probably didn't (...) (16 years ago, 19-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.936)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark
|
| (...) The LEGO Company did not clone the Kiddiecraft brick. They licensed the design, then bought the rights to it outright, and then improved upon it with the addition of the tubes inside the bricks that prevent cross-stacked parts from sliding (...) (16 years ago, 17-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.936)
|
|
| | Re: Victories for smokefree ballot initiatives
|
| (...) They're open to the public. We aren't talking about esatblishments that close their doors to people walking in. Nontheless, I don't sense we can agree on this issue, as we take a fundamentally different approach towards individual rights. (...) (21 years ago, 10-Nov-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.936)
|
|
| | Howto on : BFC "Hold" on 47457.dat
|
| I got an e-mail notice that a review of 47457.dat revealed BFC errors. I really don't know how to check for BFC compliance. All I did was to turn the part around to see if any of it was red. I know there's a caveat that some lines bleed red. I (...) (21 years ago, 1-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.936)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark
|
| (...) Well of course they wouldn't, but so what? The question isn't whether or not clones could thrive in the absence of the original; it's whether the original still retains exclusive rights to the studs-n-tubes design, and many courts have already (...) (16 years ago, 17-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.936)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.936)
|
|
| | Re: SciBrick is looking for you!
|
| In lugnet.org.scibrick, Leonard Hoffman wrote: SNIP (...) Fine. You want an open discussion about what I found wrong with Scibrick? I tried going back to the website to find the list of rules and regs, but the site is down for maintanence. (...) (21 years ago, 24-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.scibrick) !!
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.934)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.934)
|
|
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.933)
|
