|
 | | Re: LGPL Datsville
|
| (...) That would be really cool! Just review them carefully first since I may have made some fatal mistakes, like at the Town Hall. I just corrected one at the Water Tower. I think it was due to the unofficial version of a part was differently (...) (15 years ago, 24-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|  
rights
(score: 0.976)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.976)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark
|
| (...) From what I recall, LEGO received KiddieCraft bricks in 1947 along with their first molding machine. The bricks were (if I infer correctly) presented to LEGO as examples of what can be done with plastic injection molding. LEGO probably didn't (...) (15 years ago, 19-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.976)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark
|
| (...) The LEGO Company did not clone the Kiddiecraft brick. They licensed the design, then bought the rights to it outright, and then improved upon it with the addition of the tubes inside the bricks that prevent cross-stacked parts from sliding (...) (15 years ago, 17-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.976)
|
|
| | Re: Victories for smokefree ballot initiatives
|
| (...) They're open to the public. We aren't talking about esatblishments that close their doors to people walking in. Nontheless, I don't sense we can agree on this issue, as we take a fundamentally different approach towards individual rights. (...) (20 years ago, 10-Nov-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.975)
|
|
| | Howto on : BFC "Hold" on 47457.dat
|
| I got an e-mail notice that a review of 47457.dat revealed BFC errors. I really don't know how to check for BFC compliance. All I did was to turn the part around to see if any of it was red. I know there's a caveat that some lines bleed red. I (...) (20 years ago, 1-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.975)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark
|
| (...) Well of course they wouldn't, but so what? The question isn't whether or not clones could thrive in the absence of the original; it's whether the original still retains exclusive rights to the studs-n-tubes design, and many courts have already (...) (15 years ago, 17-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.975)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.975)
|
|
| | Re: SciBrick is looking for you!
|
| In lugnet.org.scibrick, Leonard Hoffman wrote: SNIP (...) Fine. You want an open discussion about what I found wrong with Scibrick? I tried going back to the website to find the list of rules and regs, but the site is down for maintanence. (...) (20 years ago, 24-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.scibrick) !!
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.973)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.973)
|
|
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.973)
|
|
| | Re: Victories for smokefree ballot initiatives
|
| (...) I'm with Dave on the interpretation of the job issue. As for letting people make their own stupid decisions--in general--sure. Let people choose to smoke, I can't prevent them from doing so in their own home, or among a group of consenting (...) (20 years ago, 3-Nov-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.972)
|
|
| | Re: More Election Bad News?
|
| (...) That is such a simple and elegant solution to the whole debate. I was really hoping Kerry (or somebody!) would voice this opinion--it's such a simple, easy-to-make-sense-of position, compared to his (and others') "I am against letting gay (...) (20 years ago, 23-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.970)
|
|
| | More Election Bad News?
|
| Looks like Proposal 2, a state amendment banning all forms of homosexual unions will be passed in Michigan: (URL) don't get it. Can't we have the word 'marriage' stricken from all our laws and legalese and replaced with the term "civil union", open (...) (20 years ago, 22-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.969)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 0.969)
|
|
| | Re: A question for my Canadian pals
|
| (...) What follows is all plowed ground... The above presents a false dichotomy in my view. It suggests that either those that are unlucky suffer, or else government has to transfer income (fundamentally, at the point of a gun, since taxation is not (...) (20 years ago, 6-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.969)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.969)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.968)
|
|
| | Theory vs. practice (was Re: Polyamory
|
| All of what I say below is plowed ground, stuff I and others have said before, so those that pay attention are invited to skip this entire post. They already know this stuff. Scott, though, might want to pay attention, for once. I won't hold my (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.968)
|
|
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.968)
|
