|
| |
|  
all, rights, property
(score: 5.004)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 5.003)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 5.003)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 5.003)
|
|
 | | Re: An armed society...(what if?)
|
| With every gun debate I see/read, it seems to me more people would rather live unarmed. I seems likely to me that, within my lifetime, guns will be outlawed from private citizens. Why do I think this likely? Because I just don't see enough people (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 5.003)
|
|
| | Re: Israel and Palestine
|
| (...) Would it be possible for ownership to be *purchased* from legitimate previous owners rather than having had to have been in the family all that time? Or are you saying that purchasing land can't be done, only inheritance is acceptable as a (...) (23 years ago, 9-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 5.003)
|
|
| | Re: Family values?
|
| (...) The fact that you suggest the self-evidence of marriage indicates that you and I have two fundamentally divergent worldviews. That's fine, of course, but we need to recognize that certain issues are therefore insoluble between us, and this may (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 5.003)
|
|
| | Re: Brickfest(sm) Service Mark
|
| (...) Kevin, I am asking this in all seriousness. Please take the time to answer here as honestly and as well as you possibly can. What exactally do you, and the several others you mention, believe is happening here in regards to the threads about a (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.events)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 5.003)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 5.003)
|
|
| | Re: Arguing about nature, Nature, and ethics
|
| (...) Feel free to call me Lar or Larry. (...) No, I don't think this is necessarily true (whether others agree with it or not). I am not a moral relativist. I think there is an objective morality that is proper and good for humans to embrace. I've (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 5.003)
|
|
| | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| Hi Maggie, This is debate, so that's what we'll do. "Maggie Cambron" <mcambron@pacbell.net> wrote in message... (...) I'm (...) clarification. I disagree. I don't believe anyone's viewpoint will be swayed if we all keep our opinions to ourselves. I (...) (24 years ago, 11-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 5.003)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 5.003)
|
|
| | Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear)
|
| Thanks Suzanne. It's good to hear what your thinking about all of this. (...) This is an interesting point. Personally, I put my own interests above those of the Lego Company, and I think that's true for a lot of us here. That's not even a painful (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.people)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 5.003)
|
|
| | Re: IP ( was Re: LP POINT 1
|
| (...) I have now corrected my spelling. (...) Yes. Naturally, just because it can be copyrighted does not make it right to do so. I think inventions and formulations can be copyrighted/patented to protect “investment” of time / money – otherwise (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 5.003)
|
|
| | Re: Capitalism (was: People are idiots...)
|
| (...) I think that one must agree to either: a) because people have a right to exist somewhere, space/volume/area/land is not a good in the normal sense and we have to figure out what it is and how we handle it, or b) because space/volume/area/land (...) (22 years ago, 10-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 5.003)
|
|
| | Re: Thanks but no thanks
|
| (...) Just nitpicking here, not sure of the overall relevance, but... Bad analogy. (having tried and failed to move cows and having actually fixed fences). It's a LOT easier to fix a fence that doesn't want to be fixed than to move a cow that (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 5.003)
|
|
| | Re: Fixing the world (was Re: Ldraw cannon
|
| <366DDFEB.DF57435D@c...OSPAM.com> <slrn76s42j.1so.cjc@...S.UTK.EDU> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) If you donate money of your own free will, to a cause that you believe is worthy, because it helps (...) (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 5.003)
|
|
| | Re: Selling MOC Instructions? Your Thoughts?
|
| (...) I think technically no. Again, I am not an atty. and this is not legal advice, but despite not having current access to Westlaw/Nexus/Lexus I have a fairly educated opinion about these things... Companies have copyrights, trademarks, and (...) (23 years ago, 19-Dec-01, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 5.003)
|
|
| | A question regarding 3rd party selling of LEGO stuff
|
| Ok, obviously it is ok to sell LEGOs in the third party or "aftermarket" fashion - case in point being Bricklink and eBay. One can sell whole sets or individual pieces, even instructions, without having to get permission per say to do so from LEGO. (...) (23 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 5.003)
|
|
| | Theory vs. practice (was Re: Polyamory
|
| All of what I say below is plowed ground, stuff I and others have said before, so those that pay attention are invited to skip this entire post. They already know this stuff. Scott, though, might want to pay attention, for once. I won't hold my (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 5.003)
|
