LUGNET News : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 1601 – 1620 of about 136000.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: The real Phantom Menace and the fall of the republic
(...) You mean over the past hundred years? It seems to me that today is the natural evolution of a hundred years of incrementally giving up the American way. (...) Yeah. From my informal discussion over the past two months, most people don't really (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.341)

		Re: The real Phantom Menace and the fall of the republic
(...) I disagree. Two hundred years ago, as now, the rights of the individual were paramount, but the definition of individual was very different and was suited to the demands of the time. Would slave-dependent states have signed the Constitution (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.341)

		Re: The real Phantom Menace and the fall of the republic
(...) Well, if they were alive today -- I'd kiss Thomas Jefferson, shake hands with guys like Madison and Jay, and kick Hamilton in the pain zone (::sigh:: if only Burr had killed him sooner =oP). No arguments over the value of the Declaration, it (...) (23 years ago, 1-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.340)

		Re: The real Phantom Menace and the fall of the republic
(...) Some people were already agitating for the freeing of slaves. The southern states would not accept such a change to their economy. I am pretty sure slaves were understood to be individuals with rights, denied them or not, what was asserted (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.340)

		gay by birth vs. gay by choice
the following is a question and answer excerpt from a debate on another website. The questions seem to me very clear and logical. The answers, however, do not; sometimes they seem rather desperate. I find it very interesting that the person (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.340)

		Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice
As far as i am concerned, the whole deate is moot. Not only that, but it is dangerous because of its potential impact on society. Also, the way the various quotes describe homosexuality leave the issue somewhat clouded. As i see it: - (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.339)

		Is this fair?
U.S. Supreme Court, ASHWANDER v.TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, 297 U.S. 288 (1936) [abridged, for full text try somewhere like findlaw.com] The Court developed, for its own governance in the cases confessedly within its jurisdiction, a series of rules (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.339)

		Re: Walmart Clearance?
I quizzed a WalMart manager concerning the procedures for discounting products. WalMart management, specifically the toy dept. manager, has complete discretion as to when and amounts of the discounts that will be applied to the toys. Usually the (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.shopping)

all, property
(score: 2.339)

		Re: FOTY, at least for me.
(...) There was recently a flap in the paper here about scalping. NC State has a new policy banning resale of tickets on their property which upset people like season ticket holders or just folks who showed up for a game and one person wasn't able (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, property
(score: 2.337)

		Re: Gone soft...
(...) It's MY DESIGN for the mecha hands, but I don't care who uses them. As to the question of Lego elements -- these are not Lego elements no matter how much some would like them to be. Instead, they are digital rendered elements similar to Lego (...) (23 years ago, 12-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build.mecha)

all, rights
(score: 2.337)

		Re: FOTY, at least for me.
(...) Well others have said it but I think it bears repeating, I'm not sure I'd characterise taking advantage of a price in the system that the system chose to assign as theft. He did nothing to interfere with Target's knowledge of their prices or (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.shopping)

all, property
(score: 2.337)

		Re: My (VERY) Large MOC (full scale house)
"Martin Scragg" <mnm@ains.net.au> wrote in message news:Gq6pAs.1q2@lugnet.com... (...) Judging from the background hills, meandering stream, the slope up to the house and the open breezeway architecture, it is easy to work out that you are using (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jan-02, to lugnet.loc.au)

all, property
(score: 2.337)

		Re: "MOC" Blacksmith Shop on lego.com
Hello everyone! I was as surprised and to see this post as anyone last night. I obviously knew of this set, but I don't think this is how LD intended to unveil their first MOC product. I don't mean to scold the folks of Lugnet for jumping the gun, (...) (23 years ago, 14-Dec-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct) !!

all, rights
(score: 2.337)

		Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
(...) It may be bluntly stated, but frankly, if you are not here to work with all the members and users of Lugnet to make Lugnet a better place, I think you are in the wrong place. Take a look at the Lugnet plan for some of Todd's and Suzanne's (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general) !!

all, property
(score: 2.336)

		Re: "MOC" Blacksmith Shop on lego.com
(...) It does indeed sound like a lot of work. (...) I wonder if some other 'guild' will attempt to fill this marketing void? Why not offer just high quality step-by-step instructions for models you can build with parts you already have? (...) Based (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.general)

all, rights
(score: 2.336)

		Re: An armed society...
(...) Ah, the dangers of abridged source material. I found a more extensive discussion of that case at: (URL) appears that the case involved due process and the right to use one's property (in this case, residence) as one sees fit, as is spelled out (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, property
(score: 2.336)

		Re: An armed society...(what if?)
(...) The Templars, indeed. It was the Hospitalars, but the money was provided by the Gnomes of Zurich. Fnord. (...) To actually address Chris' question back up at the top: as few as two. But conspiracy is usually defined as having some illegal (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, property
(score: 2.336)

		Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
(...) I disagree. To me, the Lego minifig as always been aracial. Yes, it tends to have the physical characteristics of a caucasian, but it is not hard to take the same skin tone and change the features and come up with a black guy. (I think this (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.mediawatch)

all, rights
(score: 2.336)

		Re: An armed society...(what if?)
(...) I'm not sure what your point is or how you can draw that conclusion (I already addressed your "liberal media" comment - did I miss the reply?). (...) Well, you lost me again. What does that have to do with gun control? And passing a (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, property
(score: 2.336)

		Re: questions on current events
If youi want to talk bastardy things that so-called enlightened western powers have done, how about: 1. The international land mine ban (not signed by the US, Israel or Finland- also not signed by China, Russia parts of africa, Iraq, Iran, etc.) (...) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.336)

More: Next Page >>