|
 | | Bob The Builder Duplo
|
| Hi all, Haven't seen this mentioned on lugnet but the press release is around a month old. Lego has licensed Bob the Builder and plans to release a 5 set Duplo range next year, due for release around September. (URL) Company “Cements” Deal With (...) (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.duplo)
| |
|  
all, property
(score: 2.464)
|
|
| | Re: Concerns with Racial Attitudes and Lego
|
| (...) Semantically, there's no necessary connection. But around 1800 or so, with the rise of scientific racism, the two became linked. It started out as a way for otherwise decent human beings to "justify" the moral rectitude of slavery (and later, (...) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.464)
|
|
| | Re: Concerns with Racial Attitudes and Lego
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John DiRienzo writes: First off, I just want to say I apologize to John, I think I misunderstood a lot from here, and we had our own disagreements elsewhere. I sincerely apologize to you Johm, and everyone here, for being (...) (24 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.464)
|
|
| | Re: Parts license
|
| (...) I'd definitely be somewhat concerned about a license which restricted the parts from being used with non-free programs. I'd hate to preclude the possibility of a really awesome commercial program being forced to re-invent the wheel, and (...) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.463)
|
|
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.463)
|
|
| | Re: Parts license
|
| (...) Why do you think that way ? If the person was writing a new part then he could use any license he wanted but he's using someone else's work and IMO it's fair to give the original author the same rights that he gave you. A person could for (...) (24 years ago, 22-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.463)
|
|
| | Re: Lego Maniac's Webring and Yahoo
|
| (...) Which is the definition that counts. (...) Yes, I suppose. But I do it from a screen that i'm not looking at anyway (I'm doing it right now as I type this... I clicked on an ad and switched away) which makes it only a teeny bit intrusive. (...) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.463)
|
|
| | Re: Parts license
|
| (...) This is a good point, and I agree with it. I don't know if it has anything to do with copyright or not. (...) As I understand it (and IANAL), 'copyright' applies to the expression of ideas. So you can hold copyright on a file, which prevents (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.463)
|
|
| | Re: Parts license
|
| Have you covered the case where a parts author submits a new part for review, but because of errors the part is rejected? I think you should still have ldraw.org retain rights to modify and distribute, so that someone else could clean up the file (...) (24 years ago, 21-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.462)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.462)
|
|
| | Re: Parts license
|
| I am sorry to jump in so late. I am the debian packager of LeoCAD. My general thoughts on this follow. I think it would be best to use a common, existing license rather than add to the license soup if at all possible. Of course, one doesn't want to (...) (24 years ago, 23-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.462)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.461)
|
|
| | From Harry Browne
|
| Posted in its entirety. Note that I personally do not think it's appropriate to forward this to everyone in your address book as the message advocates, I'm a bit disappointed by that. I only forwarded it to those people that I felt were likely to be (...) (24 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.461)
|
|
| | Re: My Official Viewpoint
|
| (...) 2 posts back... so the >> are not quite right Chris said: (...) Helps? To my way of thinking this particular subthread is not about JarJar per se, or even about real characters vs. fantasy. It's about when is portrayal of the initiation of (...) (24 years ago, 6-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.460)
|
|
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.458)
|
|
| | Re: PayPal Changes
|
| (...) simply (...) Yep. This fee, for those wondering where it is described, is buried in the "announcements" section after you log in to your account. It's rather hard to find, I just went looking for it again and I can't seem to locate it. I think (...) (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.services)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.458)
|
|
| | Birthday in Solitary Confinement
|
| From the LP newsletter I get emailed to me, excerpted to remove the requests for donations to run ads and letters to Todd to show solidarity: <begin cite> <snip> Today, October 7 is Todd McCormick's birthday. He will spend his 30th birthday in a (...) (24 years ago, 8-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.457)
|
|
| | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) I think there's a big difference between an act of self defense, and chasing someone down after the fact. Vigilante justice should not be tolerated. I know that it is a very fine line, but my feeling is that once a perpetrator is leaving the (...) (24 years ago, 18-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.457)
|
|
| | Re: Community to design new LEGO T-shirts
|
| (...) I believe that LEGO Direct wants to "own" the accounts wherever they choose to sell the shirts through (i.e., they keep the password to the account and they receive all the cheques at their own mailing address). That way, (1) they know all the (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.456)
|
|
| | distribution of show money
|
| Hello again experienced train heads: Two months after our (NALUG) first train show we have received a cheque for almost $350 canadian. This was totally unexpected, they didn't even give us a hint that they would pay, let alone give us a formula for (...) (24 years ago, 22-Nov-00, to lugnet.trains.org)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.456)
|
