Results 1801 – 1820 of about 14000.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: Battery voltage
|
| You know, after the first time I read through the SDK for 2.0, I always wanted to try sending immediate commands from the RCX to another one. that, I suspect, I can do with the standard firmware and NQC (I'll have to try). But to get information (...) (19 years ago, 8-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
| |
|  
firmware
(score: 1.777)
|
|
| | RE: Interactive human-controlled bots
|
| The three buttons on the remote control simply send messages 1, 2, and 3. These are the only buttons that send IR codes that can be processed by your RCX program. All the other buttons send codes that get processed directly by the firmware, and will (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.777)
|
|
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.777)
|
|
| | Re: time sampling under the rcx standard OS
|
| (...) Francois, I think you should be able to get much faster sampling. I can easily get 10-20 Hz, and others have claimed to get down to 3 ms. Whether it can be done at a constant rate, I'm not sure, and think it probably depends on what else is in (...) (19 years ago, 17-Sep-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.777)
|
|
| | Re: Something else is needed, I think...
|
| (...) ??? I think you are making a new interpreter sound harder than it really is. The standard firmware might not be incredibly fast, but it certainly supports multithreading, and synchronization wouldn't be hard to add. The only challenging thing (...) (25 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.777)
|
|
| | Re: Project X and game play
|
| (...) Well, I have put both my RCXs (RCXes? RCXen?) facing each other, 2 studs apart, and then i made a hinged cover for the emitters/receivers. Perhaps we should organize, and give everyone who needs them a specific block of IR message numbers to (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.777)
|
|
| | Re: Something else is needed, I think...
|
| (...) I agree on this point. I've been forced to move to legOS not by intrinsic NQC limitations but by those imposed by the RCX firmware. I still prefer to use RcxCC/NQC when I don't need legOS: programs load much faster, it's a pleasant and (...) (25 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.777)
|
|
| | Re: FW: Something else is needed, I think...
|
| (...) Do you mean, when a timer reaches a certain value, run a specified task? Can't you do this already, or is something broken with the current firmware in this regard? (It seem that some combination of wait and start_task should do the trick, (...) (25 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.777)
|
|
| | Re: legOS
|
| (...) I'd have to disagree on this point. I write in assembler which manipulates register bits directly and is considered software. Firmware is simply software that does NOT reside on magnetic media. (...) Jim West NIC Team Lead MCI Worldcom (...) (26 years ago, 1-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.777)
|
|
| | Re: ideas for a RIS 2.0 - Rechargability
|
| I tried NiMH batteries in my RCX. It lost its firmware. I suspect the output voltage (6 x 1.2 = 7.2) is too low. You should be able to do it using an external battery pack, but I suggest you use 8 cells instead of 6. The resulting 9.6 volts shouln't (...) (25 years ago, 28-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.777)
|
|
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.777)
|
|
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.777)
|
|
| | Re: Cybermaster purchase is it a good thing ?
|
| (...) value, as (...) Yup, it is. It has less memory, no LSD display, no flashable firmware and only one program "slot". Two of the three motors available, are fixed to the brick. Due to it's radio-link instead of IR-link, I tend to use it with PC (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.777)
|
|
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.777)
|
|
| | Bad Ir
|
| Greetings All, I had very much the same problem. "RCX not Responding". I had been able to load the firmware and one or two small programs, before the unit died. After many, many emails back and forth with the Lego Troubleshooter team, They narrowed (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.777)
|
|
| | Re: Programming, NQC and the RCX
|
| The only way I now around these limitations is to use an alternate firmware. LegOS is a true c environment instead of being "not quite c" LeJOS is full featured Java VM. Both of these give you full control over memory usage, so the number of (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.777)
|
|
| | Re: rtl10 robot roll call
|
| (...) GF-X (...) Ka-On Lee (...) 1 (...) 0 (...) NQC /w RCX 1.5 firmware (...) 3x 9v Gear. (...) 2x (...) 1x (...) 0 (...) 0 (...) None (...) Standard one Y side rail and X cross over rail to move the arm. Algorithm: Scan all, then select blocks to (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.777)
|
|
| | legOS library path
|
| Hello!! Testing the instalation of legOS-0.2.6 (cygwin) after download succesfully the firmware and some sample programs of demo directory to the RCX, i create a new directory called mycode, i put all the *.c and Makefile files from demo directory, (...) (22 years ago, 7-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.777)
|
|
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.777)
|
|
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.777)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
