To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 6594
6593  |  6595
Subject: 
Re: ideas for a RIS 2.0 - Rechargability
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Sat, 28 Aug 1999 00:01:13 GMT
Viewed: 
1879 times
  
I tried NiMH batteries in my RCX. It lost its firmware. I suspect the output
voltage (6 x 1.2 = 7.2) is too low. You should be able to do it using an
external battery pack, but I suggest you use 8 cells instead of 6. The
resulting 9.6 volts shouln't pose a problem as the input voltage is rated at
9...12 volts.

Arjen

Tom Cramer wrote in message
<3.0.6.32.19990818121539.00975670@24.236.3.131>...
> David List wrote:
> > How about rechargeable RCX and IR tower with a regular power supply?
> 
> This would be nice, but remember that toy companies are one of a few
> reasons disposable batteries exist. :-)
> 
> On the subject of rechargability though, has anyone used the new
> Energizer Ni-MH batteries in the RCX?  How do they compair to normal
> batteries?  I use them in a few other devices, and was wondering if I
> should shell out for more batteries of this type.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Tom Cramer  -  Drakino@Usa.Net
> Sent via pdQmail on a Palm V
> 
> --
> Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
> 



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: ideas for a RIS 2.0 - Rechargability
 
(...) This would be nice, but remember that toy companies are one of a few reasons disposable batteries exist. :-) On the subject of rechargability though, has anyone used the new Energizer Ni-MH batteries in the RCX? How do they compair to normal (...) (27 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR