LUGNET News : Search Results: "Impossible to disassemble"


Search Results: "Impossible to disassemble"

Results 2446 – 2465 of 2795.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
Frustrated Comments Ahead: Is there any summary information available to try and understand how some of the major AFOL resources are now being administered? Both Lugnet and Brickshelf seem to have undergone major practical changes in the last few (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX) !!

impossible
(score: 0.724)

		Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
Hello, This is my first post to lugnet so please be nice. I rely on lugnet to point me to the latest lego news, and for that I have found no better site. So first of all thank you to all the people who make this possible. Secondly, I have a few (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)

impossible
(score: 0.724)

		Re: Conditional lines on sloped wedge parts 43720 and 43721
(...) I think the key difference is the twisted nature of this surface. I think the twist makes it impossible to partition the surface into polygons without having a mix of convex and concave seams. I'd like to be proven wrong. I don't have one of (...) (19 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)

impossible
(score: 0.723)

		Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
(...) Yes. Currently, that is the bulk of my purchases. Duplo is where my money is spent right now. I find that anything purchased for me is usually bought via eBay or AuctionBrick. (...) Twin niece and nephew. I have to do something to help (...) (19 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)

impossible
(score: 0.723)

		Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
(...) Yes. I currently buy for a 2 year-old and a 9 year-old (well, a 32 year-old too, but that wasn't the question) (...) It's a great creative toy. You can literally build anything with it. I want my nephew and my daughter to know what it feels (...) (19 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)

impossible
(score: 0.723)

		Another resignation: I'm stepping down.
Dear Lugnet, Following the recent events concerning Administrator responsibility to the community, I have decided to resign my position. Several users have publically called my motives into question - have accused me of using my Admin powers for a (...) (19 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX) !!

impossible
(score: 0.723)

		Re: Badgering emails
(...) First of all, one can try to get a receipt from the receivers mail program. This is certainly not fool proof, but if you get a receipt, the receiver has almost certainly seen at least the Subject of the mail. If you never get a receipt, you (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

impossible
(score: 0.722)

		Re: Context: LUGNET is not a democracy
Well first off I would like to apologize to Duane, I wasn't specifically refering to you, nor did I mean to imply you were childish, but instead I meant people getting really mad over lego issues is silly. I guess I was trying to say that life is (...) (19 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

impossible
(score: 0.722)

		Re: 8 Wide LEGO Thomas! (pics)
(...) They are five studs in diameter. The faces I used on my 6 wide Thomas characters were just shy of 4 wide. I think that these new faces would be virtually impossible to use on 6 wide trains and have the results look good (except, perhaps, for (...) (19 years ago, 6-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.duplo, FTX)

impossible
(score: 0.721)

		Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek wrote: <snip> (...) That's my huge hang-up. Why is it so impossible and dangerous to make an investment into the Trains line, yet at the same time some completely clueless individual or group convinced the right (...) (19 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au, FTX)

impossible
(score: 0.721)

		A mystery!
When I got home just now I found a parcel in my mail box, but because the opening at my end of the post office box is smaller than the opening on the side the mail person shoves it in, and because of hte dimensions of the parcel - it was almost (...) (19 years ago, 14-May-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)

impossible
(score: 0.721)

		Re: The all-new LUGNET .Underground
(...) [...] (...) OH WOW!!! Wouldn't that be totally cool?! Like, there -are- those underground caverns with drops of thousands of feet, right?! hoh - that's way creeper than those silly train bridges ;-) And there ARE underground rivers. OOooo! And (...) (19 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.underground)

impossible
(score: 0.720)

		Re: Trolley
(...) Guys, Thanks for the potential builds. Please let me know of any build problems you encounter or, if you have suggestions for improvements. I would be interested in modifying the instructions accordingly. Other than the impossible(?) tan and (...) (19 years ago, 20-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)

impossible
(score: 0.720)

		Re: Repost, for the benefit of those on newsreaders
(...) Are you on a newsreader? I've only ever accessed LUGNET via browser, so the whole thing's a mystery to me. (...) You fool! You'll kill us all! One editorial note: When I use Bush's name in a general sense as in "Bush invaded Iraq," of course I (...) (19 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

impossible
(score: 0.720)

		Re: Repost, for the benefit of those on newsreaders
(...) That fills me with (URL) skepticism> (...) (reverting to FTX:-) (...) He was a known entity when re-elected. You had your chance and muffed it. Wait until '08. (...) Specify, and include to whom we should apologize. (...) If you really (...) (19 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

impossible
(score: 0.719)

		Re: A few things...
(...) Here are a few thoughts--not sure how feasible they are, and some will require greater diplomacy than is currently available to the administration. 1. Get rid of Bush. His handling of this entire debacle has been nightmarishly inept and (...) (19 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

impossible
(score: 0.719)

		Repost, for the benefit of those on newsreaders
Someone expressed frank misgivings about the formatting of this post: (URL) can I say? The FTX shows up just fine on my browser. But because I am a kind and generous soul, I am reposting in plain text -----repost begins here----- Here are a few (...) (19 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 0.719)

		Re: Repost, for the benefit of those on newsreaders
(...) I haven't used the newsreader since the first years of LUGNET, and not since the advent of FTX, so it is a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma to me as well. (...) As a feature of my fiendish plot, only those who have faith in the UN (...) (19 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

impossible
(score: 0.719)

		Re: Repost, for the benefit of those on newsreaders
(...) How would you know? The Diebold machines can make up whatever results they're programmed to make up, and there is no paper trail of validated vote receipts to audit... recounts consist of checking the same files again to see if they have the (...) (19 years ago, 28-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

impossible
(score: 0.719)

		BlueTooth bad, Zigbee good
(...) Bluetooth is actually very poor for embedded or robotic applications. It's a power hog, development tools are expensive (try $5000 minimum), true peer to peer modules are almost impossible to get unless you are a Fortune 500 company, and the (...) (19 years ago, 1-Jun-05, to lugnet.robotics)

impossible
(score: 0.719)

More: Next Page >>