To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *85200 (-20)
  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
(...) Hey Brad, I am another party guilty in TLCs eyes of posting a message to the effect that I would provide my own scans of 2000 products to any who asked. I decided to pursue this until an answer came from yourself or Todd, and now that it has I (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.adventurers)
 
  Re: Two Year Before the Mast
 
Bruce Schlickbernd wrote in message ... (...) was (...) Three cheers! I got my second for $50 (though it is missing several pieces). (...) No. While it is true that I spent more for my first BSB, I also was patient, and waited until I could get one (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates)
 
  Sightings in Melbourne
 
The TRU in Melbourne has: All Polar sets All Castle 2000 sets Most new Star Wars sets (all but the Destroyer Droid and the B-Wing) The new raised roadway set (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.us.fl)
 
  Re: 2000 scans
 
(...) do (...) The right of free speech is a cornerstone of American ideology. I did sound a bit preachy however, and for that I apologize. I was simply illustrating that I thought someone telling me not to share information I have with interested (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
 
  Re: Funny Ebay Auction
 
(...) Harruummph!!!! It sounds more like they're afraid these sets will hit nationwide before the auction ends, so they'd better rip people off while they still can! Will Visit the Lego Beach Fire and Rescue Service (URL) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
 
  Re: New Star Wars Lego in Canada?
 
James, where are you located in Canada? Adam (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca)
 
  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
(...) Thank you, Brad. This is exactly what I wanted to hear. I will do so. (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
Please allow me to provide some further clarification. I agree that perhaps our position regarding the viewing of images on LEGO.com was somewhat hard- line and legalistic. It was not intended to be so. (I'll take the heat here, as it was my (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.announce, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.publish)  
 
  Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors)
 
(...) I don't either, unless the subject of sensors is currently suffering from not having its own group/list, which I don't think it is. I just responded to Rob trying to be objective. He doesn't have my support in creating a new group for sensors (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  S@H Canada Goodbye
 
I called this morning and placed my final order. A bunch of accessory packs. I foolishly asked the women about it being their last day. She said that she was a temp and by the time she got there, the place was mostly gutted, but as for the people (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca)  
 
  Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors)
 
I still can't quite understand why it is so important to get sensors out of the standard listing. Aren't robots 33% sensors and 33% actuators and 33% software (rounded to the nearest 33%)? Confused ... JB ----- Original Message ----- From: Todd (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Opions on the 4561
 
(...) Do what my wife did. Buy another set. Then carefully cut the train numbers and you get two more cars and a caboose! Dean (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Ritocchi al sito ItLUG
 
(...) (URL) sapevate che se usiamo le GIF ci tocca pagare? Ciao. Marco. (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.it)
 
  Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors)
 
(...) I would think the support of Michael Gasperi and Brian Stormont would be important here, since this would be moving a certain amount of traffic down to a lower level rather than creating new traffic from scratch (where there is no loss but (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Cool Y2K set observations
 
(...) Plain ordinary TRANS-YELLOW (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Followup on "Needs advice"
 
Jim, If you don't want/need the IR Tower that comes with that and would consider selling it, please let me know. -- -Steven "Nothin' But Net!" svore@mindspring.com "Jim West" <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors)
 
Todd, Now that everyone has been properly schooled of the ins and outs of receiving some or all robotics posts (thank you for teaching everyone), can I have my robotics.sensors? *down on floor begging* (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  2000 Lego
 
I didn't see any note about this.. Winchester TRU has some 2000 sets , star wars, and castle stuff.. star wars stuff 7134 7124 7115 7104 castle stuff 6091 6095 6096 6091 is _really_ expensive... at $89.99 for 524 pieces.. they have multiple copies (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
 
  Re: Spacecraft propulsion (was: Ship Power Core)
 
(...) Although fusion propulsion is far better than fission propulsion, there are still faster things. For example, light drives. They work by emitting light backward, as so to move foreward, an you know what the specific impulse in that case would (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.space)
 
  Re: want list (was: Re: SPACE AUCTION -- Many Rarities!!!)
 
Pictures are now on www.geocities.com/sp_888 for those who are interested. (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)

Skipped 47 messages in groups lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.off-topic.pun (Skip-filter settings)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR