Subject:
|
Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 18 Dec 1999 01:42:53 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Pink Tail <pinkmice@!StopSpammers!borg.com>
|
Viewed:
|
4332 times
|
| |
|
|
I still can't quite understand why it is so important to get sensors
out of the standard listing. Aren't robots 33% sensors and 33%
actuators and 33% software (rounded to the nearest 33%)?
Confused ...
JB
----- Original Message -----
From: Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com>
To: <lego-robotics@crynwr.com>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 1999 8:31 PM
Subject: Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors)
> In lugnet.robotics, Rob Hendrix writes:
> > Todd,
> > Now that everyone has been properly schooled of the ins and outs of
> > receiving some or all robotics posts (thank you for teaching everyone),
> > can I have my robotics.sensors? *down on floor begging*
>
> I would think the support of Michael Gasperi and Brian Stormont would be
> important here, since this would be moving a certain amount of traffic • down
> to a lower level rather than creating new traffic from scratch (where • there
> is no loss but only potential gain).
>
> Perhaps you could write up a proposal, including a charter, and put it out
> for comments/review.
>
> --Todd
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors)
|
| (...) I don't either, unless the subject of sensors is currently suffering from not having its own group/list, which I don't think it is. I just responded to Rob trying to be objective. He doesn't have my support in creating a new group for sensors (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
30 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
