Subject:
|
Re: sensors (was: Re: New newsgroup lugnet.loc.eu)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 23:45:14 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Pink Tail <PINKMICE@BORGnospam.COM>
|
Viewed:
|
2726 times
|
| |
| |
I would personally vote against removing sensor communications from
the mainstream. If you do remove it, I think you'll deprive a lot of people
from coming up with the imaginative solutions to some of the more
challenging
sensor problems.
I personally only react to what appears in my email. Browsing the lists of
saved messages doesn't work for me!
JB
----- Original Message -----
From: Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com>
To: <lego-robotics@crynwr.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 6:40 PM
Subject: sensors (was: Re: New newsgroup lugnet.loc.eu)
> In lugnet.loc.eu, Rob Hendrix writes:
> > In lugnet.announce, Todd Lehman writes:
> > > A new wide-spanning newsgroup for LEGO enthusiasts in Europe (European
> > > Union and European countries) has just been created. This will help
> > > minimize massive crossposting in the case of wide topic discussions
> > > such as a European LEGO Fest.
> >
> > How about a lugnet.robotics.sensors
> > Just a thought...
>
> (Not disagreeing; just playing devil's advocate and collecting data...)
>
> Is the topic of sensors (homebrew or otherwise) something that would benefit
> from a more focused group? Are there discussion threads about sensors which
> peter-out or get lost in the main group or go off-line to private email
> because people feel they're getting too off-topic or esoteric? Do the sensor
> über-gurus like MichaelG wish that they had a separate group/list for this?
>
> It looks like sensors sure get mentioned a lot, in any case...
>
> http://www.lugnet.com/robotics/?q=sensor+sensors
>
> --Todd
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
30 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|