Subject:
|
Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 18 Dec 1999 02:11:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4178 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, "Pink Tail" <pinkmice@borg.com> writes:
> > In lugnet.robotics, Rob Hendrix writes:
> > > Todd,
> > > Now that everyone has been properly schooled of the ins and outs of
> > > receiving some or all robotics posts (thank you for teaching everyone),
> > > can I have my robotics.sensors? *down on floor begging*
> >
> > I would think the support of Michael Gasperi and Brian Stormont would be
> > important here, since this would be moving a certain amount of traffic
> > down to a lower level rather than creating new traffic from scratch
> > (where there is no loss but only potential gain).
> >
> > Perhaps you could write up a proposal, including a charter, and put it out
> > for comments/review.
>
> I still can't quite understand why it is so important to get sensors
> out of the standard listing. Aren't robots 33% sensors and 33%
> actuators and 33% software (rounded to the nearest 33%)?
>
> Confused ...
I don't either, unless the subject of sensors is currently suffering from
not having its own group/list, which I don't think it is.
I just responded to Rob trying to be objective. He doesn't have my support
in creating a new group for sensors unless at the very least Michael G and
Brian S are both for it, and probably a lot of others. But that doesn't
mean he (Rob) or anyone else couldn't go ahead and propose it more formally
for discussion, from my point of view...
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors)
|
| I also fail to see why a seperate group is needed. If a seperate group is made, then all the people from this list that do not suscribe to the subgroup cannot participate in dicussions, unless they go to the website, or use a news reader. This could (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors)
|
| I still can't quite understand why it is so important to get sensors out of the standard listing. Aren't robots 33% sensors and 33% actuators and 33% software (rounded to the nearest 33%)? Confused ... JB ----- Original Message ----- From: Todd (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
30 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
