 | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) no, thats different. a size rule, still allows you to EXPAND a tower, if you were that clever. a no touch the ground rule, would disqualify any bot that broke, or had parts brake off. but this game is the past. lets move forward to scoring. (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) SO just say "at no time must an entry intentionally contact the ground." -Rob A> (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Rotating through a four-bit nibble
|
|
No, it's not pornographic (look over in rtlToronto - I hear it's a fun thread). But I'm working in NQC, and I need to rotate the bit series in a 4-bit (or 8-bit) nibble embedded in a 16-bit word. Annoying. Any suggestions? Masking the desired four (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) i dont read this enuff. it makes this more challenging, and I think opens it (...) actually, you can still enter a "box" with a distribution EOAT. someone suggested a 4 sided box with 4 bumpers. and a EOAT that turns to the pumper hit. i like (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | NWBrickCon™ 2005 Technic Award Sneak Peek
|
|
NWBrickCon is almost here. This is just a last little push for anyone bringing Technic MOCs. If you are bringing anything in the Technic theme please email me and let me know what you are bringing and how much table space you will need. ... and now (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.events.nwbrickcon, lugnet.events, lugnet.announce, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) my idea is that a BOX is a VERY good strategy, ESPECIALLY if I were to have KATE and Abby, and ROB each enter one. A Magno would be sure to score then. a play field of box's is not a game i want to play. if i were to do BoP again, i would not (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) Oh, I can tell you where you can put them. :-) (...) So everyone enters a 1 foot square open topped box. Does any block that gets jammed into your robot count? The "bin" we keep talking about, what is it, and how do you define that a block is (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) i think "enclose" is too "suggestive" of SOLID. i was thinking more along the lines, prevent accidental entry. so as long as you cant get a block into your bot's "hopper" (whatever that is as defined by each builder) then you DONT have to (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: BL Auction: Flare / Marbled Duplo brick for sale!
|
|
(...) Isn't this the one you got on eBay earlier this year? (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.market.auction, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Steve Hassenplug wrote: <snip> (...) It's great that rtlToronto gets a wide variety of people building for their competitions, from kids to women to PHD's... Here's my take on the orifice issue--it would be next to (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) no. if your input is a hole 10 studs, By 10 bricks (just for arguments sake) and needs to be 5 bricks off the ground...then your input device can be ANY size smaller than that. you ONLY have to deliver a 2x4 maybe i wast clear on the input (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) Maybe Jennifer & Janey could enter it (official "J"Lug entry?). I'm sure it will outscore Chris. (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) Like that. I'd even go so far as to say the playfield should come with 1 box sitting somewhere in the middle to act as a "control" that performance can be measured against. -Rob A> (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) ... (...) ... (...) So, you want to defined the exact input area, which, pretty much defines the output. Can you also tell us where the wheels & motors go? Here's my suggestion: leave the top of the input open. If someone wants to enter a box (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: It's back! Long-Lost Jetpack Element Now Being Produced...
|
|
(...) So is it just being a minifig accessory, or did they come up with something creative to do with it? -Andrusi && (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: My Latest Creation
|
|
(...) Bryan... I'd be interested in knowing how you have your drive train setup. I'm sure it is too complicated to easily explain... Maybe a couple of pictures? I've tried a few RC buggy motor drive vehicles and have found that trying to send all (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) Interesting, I guess this is what you were trying to get at at dinner about a standardized interface. Your right this makes it much more challenging, and interesting. Although it nullifies one of my ideas. Which is fine, just less explosive. (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Motorized microscale train
|
|
Using thread instead of chain links is indeed a cheaper solution, and may even give more curving options. The only problem I'd see is propulsion, thread doesn't have as much ' grip' as chain links have. (...) (URL) + (URL) The wide chain link fits (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Another offer from JJ's: escritoire & iron stove
|
|
(...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
| |
| | London Underground 1995 Tube Stock
|
|
Mind the Gap! (URL) This is my 95ts train. It is the third of my LU creations but the first one to be functionally complete. The 1995 Tube Stock was built by GEC Aslthom Metro Cammell (now Alstom) as part of the PFI (priviate finance initiative) for (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.underground, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.trains, FTX) !
|
