 | | Re: Johnny five IS alive - first MOC
|
|
(...) Perhaps switching to 2x plates instead of 4x for the tread surfaces would help - this would help to smooth the curve around the wheels, at the cost of almost doubling the number of hinges you would need to add. Otherwise, love this MOC. Great (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: civilized people
|
|
(...) All in due time. Chris (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Anatomy of a POV file (e.g. L3P suggestions)
|
|
(...) Optional, yes that would be nice. But I also see the strength in the fact that all data needed are gathered in the same file. I have downloaded so many pov-files just to discover that they have references to inc files I fail to find on the (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LD4DModeler 1.1
|
|
(...) It's nice to see that you're continuing development of the program. One thing I would like to see in a future version is the ability to create/use plugins. E.g., a spline motion path plugin that takes an object and its starting and ending (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.animation)
|
| |
| | Re: civilized people
|
|
(...) I thank you for admitting that this got way out of proportion. I acknowledge that (as is always the danger with jokes) that while not overstepping my authority at the time, as it was defined, my test/joke (of temporarily revoking your posting (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: civilized people
|
|
(...) I want my King back!!! Dave K (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Johnny five IS alive - first MOC
|
|
(...) You might find that spreading the hinge plates wider on the tread shoes will help. Having them near the centre increases the "twisting" effect if there are forces near the edge of the shoes. Also, having 3 per shoe instead of 2 may help - mine (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | civilized people
|
|
I'm done with this. This horse is dead. I would like to end this in a civilized manner. If Larry is willing to acknowledge that at the time of the .foo silliness, he used action where words, in my view, would have been more appropriate, then I will (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: "Lego" from China Sets?????
|
|
(...) This is a rather old thread, but I saw (URL) few listings> on eBay that brought this discussion to mind. I check eBay quite often for my beloved clone brand, and I've often seen it described as "Not Legos," but this is the first time I've ever (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.market.services, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: una foto strana...
|
|
(...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Anatomy of a POV file (e.g. L3P suggestions)
|
|
Here are the basic components of a POV file, as it is generated by default by L3P. Materials Color declarations Stud-tops Finishes Render-Detail Options Qual SW Bumps etc. Scene-Level Objects Camera Lights Floor Background Parts & Primitives Models (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LD4DModeler 1.1
|
|
(...) It's nice to see that you're continuing development of the program. One suggestion: it would be nice if your program supported other transformations (besides just rotation and translation), in the form of plugins that users could create and (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.animation)
|
| |
| | Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
|
|
(...) No I didn't. In fact I already said elsewhere that some had. And, it's causing some very unfortunate confusion: (URL) ... someone has made an invalid assumption there, and forgotten that we don't censor, we can only request cancels which users (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
(...) I dunno. At this point it might be very confusing. PS... plesae check your email at the address that you have registered in as your posting address (and encourage JoJo to do the same). If that email isn't a valid one to receive email on, fix (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX IR Tx Circuit
|
|
(...) Thanks for all your work on this Mark! It is very interesting, even for someone like me with only basic knowledge of electronics. Are you planning to put it all together on a web page some day? ROSCO (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
(...) You're right Larry, that would have been a much more better way. What do you think? Is it worth a second try? Leg Godt! René (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Let's Do The Time Warp Again... Was Re: Open letter
|
|
In lugnet.color, Calum Tsang wrote: <snip> (...) Wow! I just got a feeling of deja-vu all over again! Dave K (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
(...) You are right, I don't know the internal processes going on at Billund. So you said they are still making the old colors, right now? Why? What is it used for? I was under the impression that starting sometime last year, everything was being (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
(...) I believe you. Just as I believe that TLC can get Maersk Blue if they so desire. That said, what you, and other people who believe that TLC can 'snap their fingers' and go back to 'old gray' haven't stated, or probably even know, is the (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | RCX IR Tx Circuit
|
|
Here's my drawing of the RCX IR transmission circuit (receiver circuit to follow soon): (URL) With the voltages as shown, the RCX is not transmitting. The IR LEDs are powered by a 600mA current sink. I haven't measured for waveforms yet - the (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, FTX)
|
