 | | Re: Canadian Jambalaya
|
|
Michel Magnan wrote in message ... (...) box (...) James, I'm interested in any box except the Technic and junk boxes. (...) I agree, especially for the first box that finds its way here. John -- Remove the obvious to reply. (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya, lugnet.loc.ca)
|
| |
| | Re: FS ?: Large Technic Wheels from #853
|
|
(...) I'm also interested...My offer would be no more than $1.25 per wheel/tire set, though. Haven't checked market for these.... Paul Sinasohn (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| |
| | Re: Wanted: Any Instructions - ephemera
|
|
Thanks for asking for clarification, Mike. I am interested in instructions to any sets. That includes multiples, not just one instruction sheet/book per set. I am interested in just about any instructions from the 60s through 90s. I am not that (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| |
| | delay!
|
|
except for the boxes already announced as mailed (GB 1 and 2) there will be a delay on mailing the rest out that originate from me. PLEASE, if you're first, make sure I have your snail. Send it again if you're paranoid. My flight from MSP to home (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: 4563 Load N' Haul Railroad (Train)
|
|
(...) I buy a lot of trains. Ask anyone. But I won't buy a pig in a poke. The parts could be crucial to the value of the set, or not. Besides, offers for sale of items should at least be CROSS posted to market.buy-sell-trade if not CONFINED to that (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Green Wizard/Witch Hat - what set?
|
|
(...) i want one too! im making link from the legend of zelda (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: memaker part question
|
|
thanks. now all i have to do is pester someone to make it as a ldraw part. (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Mechanical question
|
|
(...) Add on: Also important in all this is the distance the tracks are apart. The further apart the less friction they have, since the radius is larger. Same happens with wheels. Laurentino Martins [ mailto:lau@mail.telepac.pt ] [ (URL) ] -- Did (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: GMLTC at the NMRA National Convention
|
|
Yes, as J1 said, we awed them. We literally are a crowd stopper. And when I say *we*, I mean it in the larger sense, as in all of us who build cool things out of Lego. What was so impressive was not anything we did specifically, but that we did it (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | RE: CyberMaster tracks (was Re: LEGO Lawn-mover)
|
|
Cybermaster has a wider variety of parts than Mindstorms. Except for the unique tracks, with the wheels and one-piece frames for mounting them, these parts can also be found in various other Technic sets. Examples are: - a rubber tipped (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Interactive human-controlled bots
|
|
(...) you (...) Check out the description and pictures of the recent "Robogladiator" event: (URL) wasn't there, but it looks like it was fun. The site shows pictures of 6- button controllers made up of two RCXes (not counting at least one to control (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Interactive human-controlled bots
|
|
Check out the reports on the RoboGladiator event which was held in May 1999 at: (URL) It's everything you want, all done with LEGO! (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Interactive human-controlled bots
|
|
(...) That's the remote control I was talking about. There is only one RCX remote control. Only three of the buttons on the remote control are useable as commands to a running RCX program. All the other buttons either cause the program to stop or (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Interactive human-controlled bots
|
|
The three buttons on the remote control simply send messages 1, 2, and 3. These are the only buttons that send IR codes that can be processed by your RCX program. All the other buttons send codes that get processed directly by the firmware, and will (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Uk Technic Box
|
|
I second that thought, but perhaps though, the UK user base isn't big enough for a specific Technic box, just one general box with a good mix? Regards, Dave. In article <FFHEGv.2JK@lugnet.com>, Michael Edwards <medwards@ukonline.co.uk> scribbled: (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: recurring sets index
|
|
If you want me to I could put links to the instructions so people can see how to build them. Write back, Z. Unger PS: I changed servers so it is (URL) instead of bricks.virtualave.net... Z. Unger dzz@mindspring.com ICQ: 14375008 (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | RE: [Rumour] FBI and Mindstorms
|
|
Next thing you know, RCS bricks will be banned on airplanes, too. Singapore Airlines for example already mentiones Furby's in their pre-recorded onboard safety announcements. You are supposed to remove the batteries from your Furby while on board. (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Model Team Chopper
|
|
Say WHAAAAAAT? The 5542 is new for 98, why would they discontinue it already? Geez, if they ARE discontinued, I'd better order 3 or 4 of them to split up for parts. (...) -- | Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp | Please do (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: Interactive human-controlled bots
|
|
(...) [snip] Or, you could get the RCX remote control available at S@H and see what kind of stuff that will transmit to your RCX - its got a lot more buttons on it! Or, since you are supposed to be running a robot, you could just program the darn (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: URL characters
|
|
(...) Wow. OK, that certainly makes sense. So, the hypothesis is that "~" may have been disallowed so that commonly available software (which used "~" for special formatting tricks) for certain languages didn't have to be altered to parse-recognize (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
