To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 9605
    QT Movie of 4565 traveling on a bridge —Adrian Egli
   With the help of a friend (thanks Tim), I decided to try out posting a Quicktime movie of a LEGO train (the 4565) traveling on my bridge structures. I choose the smallest I had but it's still 9.5MB (sorry about that). Enjoy Adrian (23 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
   
        Re: QT Movie of 4565 traveling on a bridge —Adrian Egli
   Opps, I forgot to post the address. (URL) Egli" <aegli@san.rr.com> wrote in message news:G8Cz6r.70r@lugnet.com... (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
   
        Re: QT Movie of 4565 traveling on a bridge —Saskia van Doesburg
     very cool, and good quality! I wish I had such a great bridge for my traintrack (lack of bricks I'm afraid). Maybe you can make the filesize of your movie smaller. I don't see anything happening in the movie the first two seconds or so and the last (...) (23 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
    
         Re: QT Movie of 4565 traveling on a bridge —Adrian Egli
      Thanks for the thoughts. Tim Courtney said the same and said he's going to try to get TLC to bring the Technic beams into bulk sales. I must admit, I'm new to the movies and would like to trim some of my others so they weren't so big. If you (or (...) (23 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
     
          Re: QT Movie of 4565 traveling on a bridge —Ben Gatrelle
       (...) Maybe someone in lugnet.publish.cinema can help. (Cross posting and setting FUT.) BEN GATRELLE (...) (23 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.animation)
     
          Re: QT Movie of 4565 traveling on a bridge —Tim Courtney
      "Adrian Egli" <aegli@san.rr.com> wrote in message news:G8EAo5.62L@lugnet.com... (...) Yes - I'm headed to LEGO Direct this weekend (more on that later) and I will mention the beams pack to them and try to find out more about bulk ordering and their (...) (23 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
     
          Re: QT Movie of 4565 traveling on a bridge —Jason J. Railton
      (...) Hmm. You couldn't drop some hints about tan train windows and brown 1xn bricks whilst you're there too? So many European and colonial* steam-era trains had this sort of colour scheme, and you just can't get the bits in LEGO to do a decent job. (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
     
          (canceled) —Tim Courtney
     
          Re: QT Movie of 4565 traveling on a bridge —Tim Courtney
       (...) Hmm...well, I'm not a train guy really, I don't know if the Train Summit mentioned those or not. I'll try to print this out though and take it. I don't even know what I want for my top bulk items yet....got a lot of thinking to do between now (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
      
           Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Jason J. Railton
       (...) Gosh, thanks. I wasn't sure whether I could expect that sort of lobbying to be taken seriously! And I've clearly not been into trains for long enough or I would have remembered to mention _matching_brown_doors_. :) I'm a bit disappointed with (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
      
           Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Larry Pieniazek
        (...) I'm under NDA so can't discuss exactly what was said about what we want. But what do you think? You wouldn't expect that we would have asked for things way different that what we asked for publicly in this group and elsewhere, would you? If (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
       
            Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Frank Filz
         (...) One thing I would take as giving some hope to getting a new type of train driver is that TLC has created special parts which have so far only showed up in a single set, and not even a high volume set. I suspect that if TLC gets a good feeling (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
       
            Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Rose Regner
         Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) Can I ask if something was discussed? I have been thinking about the studios line. Every store is selling the accessory sets, which I think are rather limiting in appeal if you don't have the main set. Why (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
       
            Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —John Neal
         (...) You are correct about the cross appeal of trains, which is one reason why LD is interested in them. (...) One point of fact-- remember, LD is about *direct* marketing to consumers, bypassing the retail channel (I assume that is what you mean (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
       
            Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Rose Regner
          John Neal wrote in message <3A832BFD.F599C578@u...st.net>... (...) Yea, I'm just one of those people that likes to ogle over a set in person. Rose (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
       
            Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Steve Bliss
        (...) I thought they were about direct contact, not just direct marketing. Steve (23 years ago, 20-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
       
            Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —John Neal
         (...) -John (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
      
           Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —John Neal
         (...) Hey, don't get us wrong-- we shot for the moon! But Rome wasn't built in a day, and everything we wanted won't be produced tomorrow, and maybe never. But the Romans are breaking ground;-) LTCs and LTDs (LEGO Train Dudes) caught the interest (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
      
           Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Tim Courtney
       "Jason J. Railton" <j.j.railton@cwcom.net> wrote in message news:G8G99D.BtE@lugnet.com... (...) Well, I'll do what I can, I've done lobbying for trains before, but I don't know what I can do beyond the scope of what was discussed at the Train (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
      
           Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Jason J. Railton
       (...) I'm very grateful, but I don't intend to cause any problems, particularly so close following the Train Summit. It was just another suggestion, one among many I'm sure. But, I would like to see those elements in those colours, and I'm sure a (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
      
           Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Larry Pieniazek
        (...) I certainly don't think so! Discussion is great. Asking questions is great. Intelligent speculation using what is publicly known and what business literate people know about how businesses run is great. And you can divine some remarkable (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
       
            Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Jason J. Railton
        (...) It's not exactly the tone. I guess it's just that no-one else can really follow an answer along the lines of 'I know, but I can't tell'. (...) Well, thanks Larry. I've always had model trains, just not LEGO ones because they're too expensive. (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
       
            Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —James Brown
        (...) This would be a great way to break in, and an even more affordable price point. As to the income thing...That's what I meant by saying "barely" - 60 bucks is a lot of money to a kid, but can be done; a $5 a week allowance is not uncommon, I (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
      
           Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Frank Filz
        (...) Well, right now, you could put yourself a "push" train the following way: $45 3 3737 Train Accessories $26 2 4520 Eight Curved Rails ---...--- $71 You then use your existing collection to build an engine and two cars. Unfortunately this points (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
       
            Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Larry Pieniazek
        (...) Excellent analysis, Frank! I just have to question whether people will pay 75 for a push train when for 60 more they can have the excitement of powered operation. Why did Duplo go powered? When I was buying Duplo for Taya (9 years ago when she (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
       
            Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —James Brown
         (...) I suspect that an unpowered train wouldn't exist to serve the 'system OK, power bad' market segment, but rather the 'train set under $120 (US)'. If LEGO were able to release a complete train set (more than 1 car, and track oval) for (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
       
            Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —John Neal
          Larry Pieniazek wrote: <snip> (...) While we're asking, why did *Brio* go powered?? To me, Brio was the last hold out of the old-school, traditional toy train. But have you seen Brio lately? (Have you seen Brio *prices* lately?;) Not what we played (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
        
             Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —John R. Clark
         This may want to followup somewhere other than trains, but I can't decide where... (...) I think you'd be wrong there. You think you'd enjoy it, but you wouldn't. Because after turning the train on, what is there to do? Nothing, really. Powering (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)  
       
            Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Frank Filz
        (...) Of course the powered DUPLO train is battery powered. They do still have a push train (though it doesn't come with track - a good decision for DUPLO I think, at that age, kids may not need a track). One thought I have is that many LTCs could (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
      
           Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565) —Tim Courtney
       "Jason J. Railton" <j.j.railton@cwcom.net> wrote in message news:G8Hw6M.409@lugnet.com... (...) I'll see - but from what I've heard about who will be attending, it doesn't look like its very possible. Causing problems - hmm, I doubt you'd cause (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
     
          Re: QT Movie of 4565 traveling on a bridge —Adrian Egli
       "Jason J. Railton" <j.j.railton@cwcom.net> wrote in message news:G8G2wy.KHv@lugnet.com... (...) for (...) Yea, it's those static parts I don't like either. I'm going to see if there's a Win. version of that movie editing program that Tim mentioned. (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
    
         Re: QT Movie of 4565 traveling on a bridge —Michael Clark
     (...) If you are going to use Quicktime, the Sorenson Codec is the best. Just cut the bit rate down fairly low. You can get it with Quicktime Pro. (23 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
   
        Re: QT Movie of 4565 traveling on a bridge —Sonnich Jensen
   My Win98 does not play it... what are the bridges like? Amny pictures? Sonnich Adrian Egli <aegli@san.rr.com> wrote in message news:G8D09M.94K@lugnet.com... (...) about (...) (23 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR