To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 21927
21926  |  21928
Subject: 
Re: Another Motorized Switch Design :-)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:55:06 GMT
Viewed: 
1427 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Mark Riley wrote:
   In lugnet.trains, Chris Phillips wrote:
   In lugnet.trains, Mark Riley wrote:
   New version! Now, the main body is only 4x6 studs:



This redesign is absolutely brilliant! Time to make a couple dozen automated switch points...

Thanks Chris, but apparently this design as it stands is too sensitive to the clutch strength of the components being used. Yesterday, I ran it over 100 times without the hint of a problem, but today after partially disassembling and reassembling it, it won’t go more than about 50 switches without self-destructing. I think the primary issue is keeping the motor from seperating from the base. Have to think about this...

Hi Mark,

Along with Chris, I totally agree that your design is brilliant. I tested both versions (long and short) and both prooved to be very stable with my switch points. At least after 200 tests. To be honest, I oil my switch points with pure vaseline oil, as mentioned in a former message (http://news.lugnet.com/trains/?n=21873) and this reduces very significantly the effort needed by the motor to action the switch point. It may contribute to the mechanical stability of your system.

Thank you Mark for this great contribution. Now all my 71427-based power unit are build from your proposal. :-)

All the best,

Philippe.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Another Motorized Switch Design :-)
 
(...) Thanks, Philippe. I must say that it was your article at the FreeLUG site that got me thinking along these lines. I remember having to search all over the place when I was working on my first motorized switch! Here's the latest version of the (...) (20 years ago, 17-Dec-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Another Motorized Switch Design :-)
 
(...) Thanks Chris, but apparently this design as it stands is too sensitive to the clutch strength of the components being used. Yesterday, I ran it over 100 times without the hint of a problem, but today after partially disassembling and (...) (20 years ago, 15-Dec-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)

19 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR