Subject:
|
Re: How to handel minors in "LUG's" was (Re: NELUG Turns 50!!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us
|
Date:
|
Thu, 18 Nov 1999 22:11:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1937 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us, Jeff Stembel writes:
> In lugnet.org.us, James Brown writes:
> > In lugnet.loc.us.me, Eric Kingsley writes:
> > > I think this problem can possibly be solved using some of the ideas I have
> > > stated above. Have clear cut Adult only meetings and invite kids to more
> > > public all ages meetings.
> >
> > I would suggest that it's easier (and possibly better all around) to simply
> > have all ages meetings, but make it clear that children have to be
> > accompanied by an adult.
>
> At what age would you say children *don't* have to be accompanied by an adult?
> Sixteen? Do you know of a legal basis for that kind of decision? Of course,
> we wouldn't want any child to come without permission.
Check your local laws, but I'm fairly certain that the age of majority is 18
darn near everywhere. Most places, able to vote=legally responsible for self.
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
35 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
