Subject:
|
Re: Na na na na na na na na...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2005 18:15:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1946 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Greg Hyland wrote:
| |
In lugnet.general, Anthony Sava wrote:
| |
First, Megabloks already has (or had) the Batman license...
|
Actaully, it was Art Asylum and Play Along Toys that had the Batman licence
with thier C3 and Mini-Mates line. Appauling construction sets, but cool
figures. They obviously don’t have the licence any more!
| |
Megabloks now has a Spiderman license, complete with Doc Ock and I think the
Green Goblin... did LEGO lose that license?
|
The MegaBloks stuff looks like it’s all based on comic designs, not the
movies. Even their Fantastic Four stuff is comic based, not movie based.
LEGO Spider-Man is for the two movies. But will they do more sets when the
third movie comes out?
-Greg Hyland
|
See? Just shows to go ya just how much I pay attention at clone brands :)
Thanks for setting me straight.
--Anthony
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Na na na na na na na na...
|
| (...) Ug! Maybe I'm paying TOO MUCH attention to the clones! I'm ashamed of myself! But I do admit, I do like and collect the Mini-Mate figures, and while they've done Marvel characters just as figures, DC characters only came with those dereadful (...) (19 years ago, 25-Oct-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Na na na na na na na na...
|
| (...) Actaully, it was Art Asylum and Play Along Toys that had the Batman licence with thier C3 and Mini-Mates line. Appauling construction sets, but cool figures. They obviously don't have the licence any more! (...) The MegaBloks stuff looks like (...) (19 years ago, 25-Oct-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
