Subject:
|
Re: Na na na na na na na na...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:39:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1868 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Anthony Sava wrote:
| |
First, Megabloks already has (or had) the Batman license...
|
Actaully, it was Art Asylum and Play Along Toys that had the Batman licence with
thier C3 and Mini-Mates line. Appauling construction sets, but cool figures.
They obviously don’t have the licence any more!
| |
Megabloks now has a Spiderman license, complete with Doc Ock and I think the
Green Goblin... did LEGO lose that license?
|
The MegaBloks stuff looks like it’s all based on comic designs, not the movies.
Even their Fantastic Four stuff is comic based, not movie based. LEGO
Spider-Man is for the two movies. But will they do more sets when the third
movie comes out?
-Greg Hyland
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Na na na na na na na na...
|
| (...) Wow. My opinion is 180° from yours. I hate the Mini-Mates figures from head to toe, but I was generally satisfied with the design of the sets (though they weren't a good dollar value, which is part of why they tanked, IMO). (...) That's (...) (19 years ago, 2-Nov-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Na na na na na na na na...
|
| (...) The first obvious thing to say is "I thought LEGO was done with licenses..." But aside from that, many questions come to mind. First, Megabloks already has (or had) the Batman license... So is this a different license than Megabloks? Like for (...) (19 years ago, 25-Oct-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
