Subject:
|
Re: Technic Axle Joiner / Cross Block descriptions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 28 Jul 2009 07:59:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
16988 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Philippe Hurbain wrote:
> I agree it is time to rationalize naming of this similar parts... I would go one
> step further and name all of them "Technic Joiner Perpendicular xxxx" since hole
> type sequence is described in the end of name, and a
> 6536.dat Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular 1 x 2 (Axle/Pin)
> could be considered as a
> 6536.dat Technic Pin Joiner Perpendicular 1 x 2 (Pin/Axle)
>
> What about naming for 44809 and the new 63869?
I agree with Philo, would remove the Axle/Pin qualifier in front and go for
example with "Technic Joiner Perpendicular 1 x 2 (Axle/Pin)"
w.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Technic Axle Joiner / Cross Block descriptions
|
| (...) I agree it is time to rationalize naming of this similar parts... I would go one step further and name all of them "Technic Joiner Perpendicular xxxx" since hole type sequence is described in the end of name, and a 6536.dat Technic Axle Joiner (...) (15 years ago, 23-Jul-09, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
