 | | Re: Oooh, will you look at *this*...
|
|
(...) Yup, he’s been alludin’ to this for quite some time now! ~Tim’s one part man, two parts god!!! ;) thanx, --==Richard==-- (URL) lugnet.year.2002, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes: (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Oooh, will you look at *this*...
|
|
(...) much easier. Perhaps the "stud" on its back is of the same kind of the one in the spiderman minifig. Further info gladly welcome. Pedro (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Oooh, will you look at *this*...
|
|
Hi, everyone-- I haven't seen any notice about this, but Tim Saupé at FBTB (URL) has some *incredible* photos from the LEGO display at the 2002 Toy Fair. In particular are lots of pics of new HP and Star Wars items, but also *this* little Lego (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New 2002 Belville Sets
|
|
(...) I guess it's meant to simulate ice, since the princess is skating about. Imagine 4 of these quarter circle base bricks with a light source below. (...) Fetch Frosty, fetch. Go get the stick. (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: New 2002 Belville Sets
|
|
(...) :-) Yes, a trans blue base brick would be super cool. That would definitely be close to the biggest transparent piece (the large quarter domes are still larger though). (...) Another minus about it is that it is all rounded and such which (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: New 2002 Belville Sets
|
|
(...) You don't have to be so diplomatic, because it's obvious that I'm confused here. :D Yes, I'm thinking about that. I'll go back and look at it again--a trans-medblue brick would be really neat. (...) Ack. I'm not sure I like it anymore. I (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: New 2002 Belville Sets
|
|
(...) Umm, someone's confused here. Pete and I have been discussing the 12x12 quarter circle base brick in 5850. I seriously doubt they've changed to a plate. Perhaps you're thinking about the 8x8 plate in 5838. (...) It's somewhat larger than the (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: New 2002 Belville Sets
|
|
(...) Not as menacing as a Duplo polar bear ;^) (...) That was my first thought. It's always hard working out the colours from box artwork, especially the size of the images on lego.com. (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: New 2002 Belville Sets
|
|
(...) It definitely looks like a plate. Given that the mold is new, I wouldn't be surprised if they're getting mileage out of it. That polar bear in the big set looks nice and menacing for minifigs, too. (...) That looks to me like the new medium (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: New 2002 Belville Sets
|
|
(...) Take 4 of them and use them in the middle of 4 (24 x 24 w 1/4 circle cutout) green base bricks from 5987, or that's what I'm planning. (...) Must say I wasn't expecting orange base bricks in Belville, but Arctic did use many orange elements (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: New 2002 Belville Sets
|
|
(...) You might be right, it does match the color of the 6x6 roof which is definitely trans blue (I'm guessing this is actually the new trans blue that Belville has which is a little darker than trans light blue). If so, it would be really cool, and (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: New 2002 Belville Sets
|
|
(...) Frank, where did you see pictures? best LFB Also: Pete, are the fires out, finally? (23 years ago, 9-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: New 2002 Belville Sets
|
|
(...) Or is that a transparent base brick ? Let's hope so. (23 years ago, 9-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | New 2002 Belville Sets
|
|
Hmm, just had a look at the new Belville sets. Ship dates in February and March. 5836 Beautiful Baby Princess $3.99 23 pcs Purple DUPLO cradle Purple 4x4x4 chest w/white drawers Purple Scala potty Small assortment of transparent bricks Purple 4x4 (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: Galidor, for good or bad
|
|
Norton Anti-Virus told me that I had a worm virus. Usually considered a reliable source. I scanned my computer after I went to the site because the scripts that it ran concerned me. We have our computer set so that we have to accept scripts in order (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Galidor, for good or bad
|
|
(...) The difference is that Bionicle is not a licensed property, Lego created it. For Star Wars, Jurassic Park, Bob the Builder, Mickey Mouse et al. Lego bought or paid for the license to use those characters, stories, and images. Essentially (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Galidor, for good or bad
|
|
(...) I was wondering the same thing, especially when Zhengrong started this thread recently: (URL) other than the intentional "animated TRS-80" look of the site, is leading folks to believe that there is a problem? Matt (23 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Galidor, for good or bad
|
|
(...) That is very true. But it's an incremental new era, not a revolutionary one. (...) The first time, except for Bionicle, right? And except for all the licensed add-on bits for the main LEGO brand, right? :) Steve (23 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Galidor, for good or bad
|
|
(...) The galidor website does have a virus-like appearance, but I have a very much up-to-date virus scanner that didn't get triggered. What makes you think it gave you a virus? --Bill. (23 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Galidor, for good or bad
|
|
UUGH!! A visit to this site gave me a worm virus. I'll never go back! Rose "Jonathan Lill" <jonathanlill@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Gr4Ay4.ALo@lugnet.com... (...) a (...) look (...) of (...) silhouette (...) each (...) be (...) than (...) does (...) (23 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
