Subject:
|
Re: LEGO Trains on trial?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 17:30:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
501 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.trains, Harvey Henkelman writes:
> > Hello everyone, I finally got a copy of the new LEGO S&H catalog. After
> > paging through this I've noticed several new sets. Star Wars, Life On Mars,
> > Trains.....did I say Trains? Silly me, I've noticed that 4565 ain't featured
> > this time. What I did see is the complete Trains contest rules and
> > stipulations. Here is my diagnosis on this matter...
> >
> > To all trainheads out there, submit an entry! LEGO Trains ARE on trial. Our
> > response will likely decide the outcome of the Train theme future.
>
> I disagree. I am much more confident of the future of trains than some here.
> And as for this contest having grand galactic significance, I don't see it.
> Like I said to Suz, it's just a fun contest.
For the record: I am very confident of the future of trains and I do not think
this contest has grand significance. But I do not think ANY company runs "just a
fun contest."
If trains were doomed, we'd hear nothing about it. They'd just disappear. This
contset draws attention to trains and gets consumers interested in them --
something LEGO would never do if they were about to kill them off.
> > To those
> > who may balk at this notion, remember that LEGO's are supposed to be a fun
> > pasttime.
who said they weren't?
The LEGO Company is a company though.
> > If one is afraid of LEGO 'stealing' their design (doubtless TLC
> > will modify our designs before committing these to the market, I don't think
> > they would be bold enough to directly plaigerize),so be it.
I'm sure TLC will change the designs -- once they own them. Plagerism would only
apply if TLC used the designs without owning them. (which is why they will own
them.)
> Again, I disagree. I don't think TLC will be using these designs for
> production.
But they could.
> Remember, (like I told Suz) D L Blair is doing the initial
> filtering. They are good "consumer contest" judges, but not competent to
> judge what is a good TLC production set and what isn't.
Right. that's why Blair's only paid to make the task easier for TLC "judges" in
picking out a desirable winner. I agree that if TLC were looking for production
models, it would be done differently. That doesn't mean this contest isn't
"warming up" for it.
> I think the "demise of trains" is a vastly overblown rumor. Leave it at that.
>
> DO submit stuff if you want, though... but it's just a fun contest, not a
> great judgement of the future of trains. That's my opinion, and my opinion
> only.
That's my opinion too. Assuming that "just a fun contest" describes the
experience of many LEGO fans (not that of TLC).
-Suz
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: LEGO Trains on trial?
|
| (...) I disagree. I am much more confident of the future of trains than some here. And as for this contest having grand galactic significance, I don't see it. Like I said to Suz, it's just a fun contest. (...) Again, I disagree. I don't think TLC (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
16 Messages in This Thread: ![LEGO Trains on trial? -Harvey Henkelman (4-Jan-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: LEGO Trains on trial? -Richard W. Schamus (4-Jan-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: LEGO Trains on trial? -Richard W. Schamus (4-Jan-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: LEGO Trains on trial? -Bob Hayes (4-Jan-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: LEGO Trains on trial? -Richard W. Schamus (8-Jan-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: LEGO Trains on trial? -Kai Brodersen (4-Jan-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![What's "a car" & what's a "digital picture"? (was:Re: LEGO Trains on trial?) -James Mathis (4-Jan-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: What's "a car" & what's a "digital picture"? (was:Re: LEGO Trains on trial?) -Harvey Henkelman (5-Jan-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: What's "a car" & what's a "digital picture"? (was:Re: LEGO Trains on trial?) -Steve Bliss (5-Jan-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: What's "a car" & what's a "digital picture"? (was:Re: LEGO Trains on trial?) -Tony Priestman (6-Jan-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: LEGO Trains on trial? -Larry Pieniazek (4-Jan-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: LEGO Trains on trial? -Dave Schuler (4-Jan-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: LEGO Trains on trial? -Steven Ooievaar (10-Jan-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: LEGO Trains on trial? -Kevin Dixon (14-Jan-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: LEGO Trains on trial? -Kevin Zwicker (14-Jan-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|