Subject:
|
Re: Legomodular standards?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Wed, 29 Mar 2000 01:35:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2561 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Robert Green writes:
> Not seeing anything yet, this might have already been covered. But, have you
> guys addressed electrical inter-operablity between modules? With 10' lego
> wires avalible from pitsco-dacta, even a parralell bus (to cut down on the
> electrical resistance of the track) would be easy to do. (and would be 100%
> lego as well)
>
> Wayne G.
Well, any module that has electrical connections to the track will run them
back to the controller area in the module. From there, a controller could be
removed and the wire just run to the other controller where multiple layouts
are connected, so I don't think it will be much of a problem. I would
personally like to see our layouts get to the size that these issues become a
problem, but right now, I think it is fairly minimal.
Mike
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Legomodular standards?
|
| (...) The GMLTC is planning on having two speed regulators for each track around our layout. We'll split the layout electrically, so we can have higher power on the uphill side, and lower power on the downhill side. We really have no idea how our (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains) !
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Legomodular standards?
|
| Not seeing anything yet, this might have already been covered. But, have you guys addressed electrical inter-operablity between modules? With 10' lego wires avalible from pitsco-dacta, even a parralell bus (to cut down on the electrical resistance (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
