To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 25687
25686  |  25688
Subject: 
Re: The End of 9 Volt? (was: Re: Train motors half price via S@H weekly special)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Sun, 7 Aug 2005 21:00:22 GMT
Viewed: 
3253 times
  
Chris Gray wrote:

Why AC? The advantage of AC is that you get much better low-speed
operation, because the rectified AC ends up being pulsed power. The motors
will make a bit of a humming noise, but would be able to creep along at
very low speeds. With AC power input, there are also no polarity issues
with feeding track or battery power into the RC receiver.

That's a highly overrated phenomenon... I'm into modelrailroading too and
for instance Fleischmann used this in their MSF controllers. However
there's very little difference between that system and regular DC systems.

What would work much better is if they used PWM, but cost would be a big
issue...

Also note that going AC would kill ANY compatibility with the old system...
always a Bad Thing
--
Jan-Albert van Ree   | http://www.vanree.net/brickpiles/



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The End of 9 Volt? (was: Re: Train motors half price via S@H weekly special)
 
(...) That wouldn't work all that well, I expect. There is a lower limit of voltage with which the electronics of the RC receiver will work. Below that, it would likely not drive the motor at all. I don't *know* any more than others (likely less!), (...) (19 years ago, 7-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains)

21 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR