Subject:
|
Re: 9v vs 12v
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Jul 2001 10:27:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
638 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Harvey Henkelman writes:
> In lugnet.trains, Alexander Johnston writes:
> > I agree. Go with 9v. However. Don't listen to Henry there. :-) Wait a
> > month and get set 10001. Most people think #4561 is juniorized junk.
> That is certainly true, but we don't even know if 10001 will include the
> speed regulator as of yet.
I think you will find that it doesn't. If you look at the box cover in the
set database, you will see that the regulator is not shown as included, but
is crossed out meaning you need to get it separately.
> By the way, Harvey suggested that Henry get the 4561-not the other way
> around. When I had my 4561, I still managed to build a small shunting
> locomotive and two flat waggons. -Harvey
I'm not getting into this debate, all I am going to say is that I have 2 of
them.
Martin
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 9v vs 12v
|
| (...) Additionally, 4558 did not have the regulator (which is presumably why the picture of the 4548 box for the regulator has a picture of the Metroliner on it). 4561 does have some good parts, just ignore the instructions.... I would like to (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 9v vs 12v
|
| (...) That is certainly true, but we don't even know if 10001 will include the speed regulator as of yet. By the way, Harvey suggested that Henry get the 4561-not the other way around. When I had my 4561, I still managed to build a small shunting (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
