To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 11218
11217  |  11219
Subject: 
Re: cramming details into 6 studs
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Tue, 15 May 2001 15:05:21 GMT
Reply-To: 
JOHNNEAL@USWEST.NETnomorespam
Viewed: 
1683 times
  
Larry Pieniazek wrote:

> In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:
> > 
> > 
> > Bryan Kinkel wrote:
> > 
> > > I have been gathering photos of commuter trains in order to build SEPTA
> > > (Philadelphia transit) cars for my layout. While I have not actually sat
> > > down to build, I have been doing a lot of thinking on 6 vs. 8 wide and how
> > > it will impact my design.
> > 
> > > Doing my cars 6 wide certainly has advantages as far as brick usage, etc.
> > 
> > Not as many as you might think.  Most people build 6 wide because it is the
> > norm, not because of economy of bricks.  Remember, a 6 wide is just an 8 wide
> > compressed by 2 studs sideways; it's not really that many bricks.
> 
> Not everyone shares that opinion. I tend to hold the opposite view.

You mean that a 6 wide is *stretched* to get an 8 wide?

> To keep
> the proportions right, in many cases you need to increase everything by a
> third, not just the width. Not always, but in many cases.

Well, that's the point.  The proportions are *wrong* to begin with in 6 wide-- if
you are trying to model to scale.  But that's okay; I mean, compression
happens;-)  It's just a matter of deciding *where* you want to compress.  Length
is the obvious choice, given the tight diameter track curves and the brick usage
issues.  But I have found that a little more width goes a long way....

And the beat goes on...

-John

> 
> 
> ++Lar



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: cramming details into 6 studs
 
(...) Again, I disagree. The body to truck proportions are wrong, yes. But, at least in my models, the LxWxH proportions are more or less correct. Sometimes the height is a bit too high for the width (maybe in the 'bug, for example) but not always. (...) (25 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: cramming details into 6 studs
 
(...) Not everyone shares that opinion. I tend to hold the opposite view. To keep the proportions right, in many cases you need to increase everything by a third, not just the width. Not always, but in many cases. ++Lar (25 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.trains)

13 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR