 | | Re: Likeness of a Talgo: Shared monoaxle
|
|
(...) Will you like me ("beter"?) if I can make a likeness of the Amtrak version of the Talgo? This Eurotrash has dumped on US soil! Is the Acela a native US design, or imported (partial?) technology? (...) Uhm...thanks? ;-) (...) I think a lot of (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Likeness of a Talgo: Shared monoaxle
|
|
What a compliment. Nobody makes beter Eurotrash! I am laughing so hard it is hard to type. Thanks Larry, Crhsi (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Another 6wide/8wide ramble was: Re: Future of LEGO Trains ? was Re: Model Railroad Scenery
|
|
(...) What is wrong with larger scenery and buildings? You should check out Legoland sometime;-) Seriously, you don't have to build ginormous structures-- we are still talking MF scale here. I will now *have* to take some photos of my double stall (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Likeness of a Talgo: Shared monoaxle
|
|
NOBODY makes better eurotrash passenger than James. Nobody. Each of his creations tops the last. Wow. A Talgo train! Who would have thunk it. What a clever mechanism. And in only 6 wide to boot. Now pendularize it! :-) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Likeness of a Talgo: Shared monoaxle
|
|
(...) So you think I should start on a CAD talgo? or the lighted nose piece? Doing a whole train set is hard, but if I start with my amt 2000 and do other cars from there well.. maybe as for working for TLC, yep if i did jr would be no more, i cant (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Another 6wide/8wide ramble was: Re: Future of LEGO Trains ? was Re: Model Railroad Scenery
|
|
Your right, I'm against 8 wide and havn't built any 8 wide. Why not? Lots of reasons: 1) 8 wide demands larger scenery and buildings. If your logic for building 8 wide is because LEGO minifig trucks are 6 wide then you should make all your buildings (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Future of LEGO Trains?
|
|
Jason Brown wrote in message <38B42F60.9B907B00@m...es.edu>... (...) never (...) comment on (...) Yep, of course the 4.5V being battery operated will work on ANY track! I assume you can combine 12V and 9V if you don't use any turnouts or crossings, (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Likeness of a Talgo: Shared monoaxle
|
|
BEEEG Snip but im working on racing models so (...) Ah come on I really want to see it,beautiful work, simply stunning, now if we could only get you a job with TLCs new product design dept. (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Likeness of a Talgo: Shared monoaxle
|
|
(...) A talga is a challenge, seeing photos of it, the engine could be 6 bricks and 2 plates high, followed by a 28 size car , say.. 4 bricks high? or cut chassis custom built, with "wings" in front, behind the engine,: ___...___ //_/ | |\________ (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Future of LEGO Trains?
|
|
(...) Just going to pop in here: The gauges are indeed the same, or close enough. My 4.5v will run on 9v no prob (well, I swapped the motor with the 9v, but the cars work just fine), and 9v cars will work on 4.5v track. And I belive that 12v is (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Future of LEGO Trains?
|
|
(...) Not to be picky, but there have been 3 voltages: 4.5v, 9v, and 12v. I've never seen any 12v and played with 4.5v once, a long time ago, so I can't comment on the gauge of the different tracks. Ben Roller (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Future of LEGO Trains ? was Re: Model Railroad Scenery
|
|
Christopher Masi <cmasi@cmasi.chem.tulane.edu> wrote in message news:38B46A14.581C66...ane.edu... (...) but (...) stuff I (...) her 8 (...) brainer (...) See comment below (...) but (...) SD40-2 (...) look (...) thought (...) which (...) thought (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Likeness of a Talgo: Shared monoaxle
|
|
(...) jaw (...) Thanks for the color suggestion. You should build it! (if you want to) My 4561 conversion took the form of my Cisalpino model. (White roof and 1x3x2 thin wall trans blue window parts from two 4561's plus a green stripe. Six 5925 (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 4,5v / 12v Train Offers
|
|
Is this a perfect example of why lugnet.market.auction.trains would make sense? I think so, but that's just me... John Matthews Giulio Ferrari <giuliof@iol.it> wrote in message news:38B42A96.A375E9...@iol.it... (...) (pointing to (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: what do these MOW vehicles do?
|
|
Frank Filz wrote: ... (...) I like the text, too: "It's the tamper you've been waiting for." /Eric/ (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Future of LEGO Trains?
|
|
(...) the (...) etc. (...) didn't (...) Oh, before anyone gets into too much of a tizzy about Playmobil trains...they are on there 3rd incarnation. The first one was made by Fallar (sp), the German Kit maker. (Play train/Hit Train) and they were to (...) (25 years ago, 23-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Likeness of a Talgo: Shared monoaxle
|
|
Wow! I gave up on that a long time ago. My solution was bulky and looked dumb because I couldn't get it close coupled (not to mention my color scheme was a absolutely hideous). Great detail shots. It is always nice to learn how to do the stuff you (...) (25 years ago, 23-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Future of LEGO Trains ? was Re: Model Railroad Scenery
|
|
snip lots of valid points (...) I agree totally. The problem really lies within me. I like the 8 wide stuff I have seen. John's Hiawatha (?) is beautiful! Barbra's (?) mototrain is gorgeous, and it is simply not possible to put the the stuff she had (...) (25 years ago, 23-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Future of LEGO Trains ? was Re: Model Railroad Scenery
|
|
(...) You make a good blah, blah [1] -John [1] (point;-) BTW, what is the width of a TGV et al? (...) (25 years ago, 23-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Future of LEGO Trains?
|
|
(...) I might have thought that too except for the existence of Playmobil trains... Playmobil was smart in choosing an existing track gauge (G) and therefore didn't even necessarily need to support its own products with track, etc. (...) You can't (...) (25 years ago, 23-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
