Subject:
|
Re: A use for TownJr
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.town
|
Date:
|
Tue, 28 Sep 1999 20:54:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2033 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999 19:08:56 GMT, "David Eaton" <wpieaton@wpi.edu> wrote:
> I'll agree here. The problem I see is that there already are lego sets and
> themes designed for younger children: Duplo, Fabuland, Basic... If they
> 'juniorize' the older kids' stuff, then what's not to stop them from
> juniorizing things like technic, etc? The point is that the line exists for a
> reason... dumbing everything down to the lowest common denominator may increase
> your popularity on that level, but it neglects the levels above.
Juniorizing Technic? Oops, too late. It's already happened.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A use for TownJr
|
| (...) I'll agree here. The problem I see is that there already are lego sets and themes designed for younger children: Duplo, Fabuland, Basic... If they 'juniorize' the older kids' stuff, then what's not to stop them from juniorizing things like (...) (27 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.town)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
