Subject:
|
Re: A use for TownJr
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.town
|
Date:
|
Sun, 26 Sep 1999 23:46:16 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm&Spamless&.org
|
Viewed:
|
622 times
|
| |
|
|
Jonathan Wilson <wilsonj@xoommail.com> wrote:
> Lego is not appropriate for a 2 yr old It says "contains small parts. not
> for children under 3" or something like that on the box.
Sure, but not all children are the same. If your child understands not to
put them in his/her mouth, and you're there to supervise, it's probably okay
to disregard the warning.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A use for TownJr
|
| (...) I have to admit I've actually read that on set boxes too. Welcome to the world of the parent. Thanks for stopping by. (...) Absolutely. Why wouldn't it be? Theoretically, you could give your child anything, (for an absurd example, a martial (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.town)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A use for TownJr
|
| (...) Lego is not appropriate for a 2 yr old It says "contains small parts. not for children under 3" or something like that on the box. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 26-Sep-99, to lugnet.town)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
