Subject:
|
Re: A use for TownJr
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.town
|
Date:
|
Sun, 26 Sep 1999 13:12:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
465 times
|
| |
|
|
Bram Lambrecht wrote in message <19990925.195310.8271.0.braml@juno.com>...
> I think most of us agree. However, Town Jr's place should NOT be to
> replace regular town models. It should be an addition instead of a
> replacement.
I don't know if I even agree to that. While the tow-truck was easy to
build, it isn't very playable. One of the most fragile models I've seen (to
the point that the support-style landing gear on my Space Cruiser held
together better). So there goes the "easier to build, more play-time"
issue--if ya' gotta' keep rebuilding it....
*My* tow-truck had opening doors and a car with a hood that lifted. His
just has a windscreen that won't stay attatched. It ought to be done away
with entirely, but while it's exists, let's hear it for the purchasing power
of a two-year old!*
Brian (bbq) Sauls
(*who probably have more influence than older children, due to the whining
factor, but no non-AFOL parent would buy their 2-year old Lego.)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A use for TownJr
|
| (...) Lego is not appropriate for a 2 yr old It says "contains small parts. not for children under 3" or something like that on the box. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 26-Sep-99, to lugnet.town)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A use for TownJr
|
| (...) I think most of us agree. However, Town Jr's place should NOT be to replace regular town models. It should be an addition instead of a replacement. --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com ---...---oooo-----(_...o---...--- WWW: (URL) (25 years ago, 26-Sep-99, to lugnet.town)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
