Subject:
|
Re: A use for TownJr
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.town
|
Date:
|
Sun, 26 Sep 1999 02:18:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
389 times
|
| |
|
|
"Brian Sauls" <barbcue@nospam.home.com> writes:
> I have therefore concluded that Town Jr. *does* have its place in our
> society--it's not too simplistic--they just have to ages wrong.(1)
I think most of us agree. However, Town Jr's place should NOT be to
replace regular town models. It should be an addition instead of a
replacement.
--Bram
Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com
-------------------oooo-----(_)-----oooo-------------------
WWW: http://www.chuh.org/Students/Bram-Lambrecht/
-----------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: A use for TownJr
|
| Bram Lambrecht wrote in message <19990925.195310.827...no.com>... (...) I don't know if I even agree to that. While the tow-truck was easy to build, it isn't very playable. One of the most fragile models I've seen (to the point that the (...) (25 years ago, 26-Sep-99, to lugnet.town)
| | | Re: A use for TownJr
|
| (...) I'll agree here. The problem I see is that there already are lego sets and themes designed for younger children: Duplo, Fabuland, Basic... If they 'juniorize' the older kids' stuff, then what's not to stop them from juniorizing things like (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.town)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | A use for TownJr
|
| I'm not intending to open a can of worms here, but up until now I've remained silent on the TownJr. bashing. Here's the way I see it: I took the kids to TRU yesterday and picked up a couple of smaller sets. My 2 1/2 year old son is as fascinated (...) (25 years ago, 26-Sep-99, to lugnet.town)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
