LEGO TECHNIC : 5673


Technic / 5673	5672 \| 5674

Subject:	Re: Site updated
Newsgroups:	lugnet.technic
Date:	Mon, 20 Aug 2001 18:03:06 GMT
Viewed:	2284 times

In lugnet.technic, Fredrik Glöckner writes: > Jennifer Clark <jen@vulture.dmem.strath.ac.uk> writes: > > > Do you have a link to this test, it sounds pretty interesting? I didn't carefully read the rest of this thread, so the following may be redundant. I've been collecting links to info about Technic motors. I too have been pondering the age-old question, "which motor is better?". Anyway, here are a bunch of links to stuff on the motors: http://web.mit.edu/sp.742/www/motor.html http://www.lego.com/dacta/elab/default.htm (look in technical specs for a link to "motor") http://prelude.psy.umontreal.ca/~cousined/lego/3-physics/motors/motorpages/motor1.html (well, this one used to work. It is down now, I think) http://www.enteract.com/~dbaum/lego/motors.html The last link contains information on normal operating currents and stall currents for the motors. It definitely shows the geared motor is more efficient. T. J.

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Site updated
(...) Sorry, I think it was just something in my mail correspondence with him. He used to have the motors connected to an amp meter, to check for stalling and so on. He compared the power consumption of each motor type under various loads, and (...) (23 years ago, 20-Aug-01, to lugnet.technic)

12 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search