 | | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but... —Ray Kremer
|
| | | We need a new group, lugnet.technic.hatea...ssince1998 I can understand people who don't go for the action-figury sets, they are pretty darn untraditional for Lego, but to disregard all these fun sets just because they aren't all boxy? (...) (24 years ago, 24-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Call me a Lego purist if you will but... —Scott Sanburn
|
| | | | | To All, (...) Well, speaking as someone who is seeing decline of sets in all themes, from town to TECHNIC sets, I think I can understand the frustration. Throwbots and Bionicles are not really what I think of as TECHNIC sets, and th econtinuing (...) (24 years ago, 24-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Call me a Lego purist if you will but... —Gaurav Thakur
|
| | | | | | | (...) I thought that the cyber slam sets weren't that bad but the throwbots/roboriders/bionicles are quite pathetic in my opinion. I thought that the Technic line was certainly moving in the right direction until some of the 1999 sets and the 2000 (...) (24 years ago, 24-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Call me a Lego purist if you will but... —Darren Chapman
|
| | | | | | | | "Gaurav Thakur" <cp5670@supermail.com> wrote in message news:GCB8Iy.Dx0@lugnet.com... [snip] (...) Cool! I haven't seen this before - when was this announced? Lugnet doesn't have a picture yet but there is an image at (URL) assume we will see this (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Call me a Lego purist if you will but... —Andrew Bissell
|
| | | | | | Any guesses on how much money The Lego Group would make, overnight! if they re-released the JCB set, the old red tractor or the original test car or indeed any of the many other fantastic technic sets there used to be? I used to have these sets as a (...) (24 years ago, 24-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Call me a Lego purist if you will but... —Bob Sardelli
|
| | | | | | | While I agree that the Technic sets of late are slightly dumbed down from previous advanced sets I don't think we can condemn TLG as a whole. It seems that the ingenuity that went into sets like 8880 is now being spent on Mindstorms. And you have to (...) (24 years ago, 24-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Call me a Lego purist if you will but... —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I too think these parts are garbage and I refuse to allow any more of them into my collection, however good the rest of the set may be. (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Call me a Lego purist if you will but... —Ray Kremer
|
| | | | | | | | (...) hate: (...) into my (...) I guess you have to be an old-school Technic collector to hate those, I rather like them. They are extremely effective on the 8448, for which they designed apparently: "Most of the Coventry concepts had body panels, (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Call me a Lego purist if you will but... —Ronald Vallenduuk
|
| | | | | | "Andrew Bissell" <ABNews@tesco.net> wrote in message news:GCB9Mr.H6A@lugnet.com... <snip> (...) with all that plastic.... Isn't next year the 25th anniversary of Technic? I think it was '77 when 850-853 were released. How about LEGO do a limited (...) (24 years ago, 24-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Call me a Lego purist if you will but... —Andrew Bissell
|
| | | | | | | What a top set that would be Duq. But how about 8850 truck and 8862 JCB. Perhaps each limited edition issue could be a collection of types of model. Set no 1 could include the parts for all of the super size cars, Set 2 for all of the planes, set (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Call me a Lego purist if you will but... —Simon Bennett
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Perhaps a more manageable idea (less pieces per bag) would be to organise by colour so: black - 8880, 8860, 8868, 8412 red - 851, 853, 8440, 8837, 8851, 8865 yellow - 850, 852, 856, 8459, 8460, 8828, 8862, 8853 Put me down for one of each - no (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Call me a Lego purist if you will but... —John Matthews
|
| | | | | | <snip> (...) bet (...) I would like one of those! Build On! John Matthews (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but... —Ronald Vallenduuk
|
| | | | "Ray Kremer" <rkremer@bradley.edu> wrote in message news:GCB6B6.8pr@lugnet.com... (...) just (...) Nothing wrong with action-man sets. I really like 8286. Not because of the figures though... Duq (24 years ago, 24-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but... —Ray Kremer
|
| | | | (...) I was referring to Throwbots/Slizer, RoboRiders, and Bionicle. Sets like 8286 still have a traditional Technic model even if you junk the figures. Now, are the Throwbots/Slizer, RoboRiders, and Bionicle real Technic sets? Of course not. Lego (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but... —David Arnon
|
| | | | (...) That's my feeling exactly. That's why I think the bionicles/slizer/etc. sub groups should be taken out of the Technic news group. - David (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
