Subject:
|
Re: Experience with Tow Truck 8462?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 07:35:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3158 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000 12:19:51 GMT, Jennifer Clark
<jen@vulture.dmem.strath.ac.uk> wrote:
> I have (a little guiltily) taken the pneumatic elements from the box and applied
> them in other models, which was interesting. Someone commented in another thread
> about using the air tanks, and how the can badly affect a model. In some ways
> I would agree with this, although the jury seems to be out on an opinion poll of
> my friends of no air tank vs. air tank. The model used a compressor with a
> pressure detecting valve which switched off the motor when the pressure reached
> a certain point. Basically, the air tank seems to:
Gotta learn to handle this tool one day:)
Just had to add this:
Using airtanks is not always a bad idea with compressors, when you
only need a single or few pneumatics actions once in a while, the air
tanks can be nice to have (ofcourse with the handpump I prefer tanks
too), but since I mostly do in continous action, there's really no
need for either tank or shut-off-valve (btw, the codepilot is
excellent for controlling a compressor that doesn't need to run all
the time). Just wanted to explain why I'm so against the tanks:)
Kind regards
John Jensen
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Experience with Tow Truck 8462?
|
| (...) I've still not built the 8462 I have yet (it is a personal bribe for getting to the halfway point in writing my thesis) but I think it looks pretty good, although perhaps a little on the large side for Technic figures. It cost 50 UKP from Busy (...) (26 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
