Subject:
|
Re: Pneumatic "One Leg at a Time" Robot Circuit
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:04:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4150 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> In lugnet.technic, Mark Bellis wrote:
> > In lugnet.technic, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> > > In lugnet.technic, Mark Bellis wrote:
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > >
> > > > When you need to have a model function move a switch, the 1+4 AND gate that Kev
> > > > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=1351862 and I
> > > > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=1366841 have both worked on is
> > > > the most cost-effective. How I forgot about it till Kevin reminded me is
> > > > probably the effect of too many trains!
> > >
> > > Is there such a thing?!?! :^)
>
> I was referring to "too many trains"!
>
> I believe any and all claims of too much LEGO to be false. Assuming your trains
> are all LEGO, then I beleive your "too many trains" to be false also!
>
> > >
> > > Kev
> >
> > An effect of too many trains?
> >
> > Perhaps a one track mind :-)
>
> This too.
>
> >
> > Mark
>
> Kev
Haha! Yes, I could never have too many trains, but a bigger house would be an
advantage since I could run 16 8mm scale trains on a big enough layout. I have
a long-term plan for a warehouse full as a museum :-)
However, too much concentration on trains and not enough on pneumatics over the
last 8 years may explain my forgetfulness. Or perhaps that is just another
impossibility and it's work and sleep that got in the way :-)
Mark
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Pneumatic "One Leg at a Time" Robot Circuit
|
| (...) I was referring to "too many trains"! I believe any and all claims of too much LEGO to be false. Assuming your trains are all LEGO, then I beleive your "too many trains" to be false also! (...) This too. (...) Kev (19 years ago, 17-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
