Subject:
|
Re: Pneumatic "One Leg at a Time" Robot Circuit
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Sat, 17 Sep 2005 20:27:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4126 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Mark Bellis wrote:
> In lugnet.technic, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> > In lugnet.technic, Mark Bellis wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > >
> > > When you need to have a model function move a switch, the 1+4 AND gate that Kev
> > > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=1351862 and I
> > > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=1366841 have both worked on is
> > > the most cost-effective. How I forgot about it till Kevin reminded me is
> > > probably the effect of too many trains!
> >
> > Is there such a thing?!?! :^)
I was referring to "too many trains"!
I believe any and all claims of too much LEGO to be false. Assuming your trains
are all LEGO, then I beleive your "too many trains" to be false also!
> >
> > Kev
>
> An effect of too many trains?
>
> Perhaps a one track mind :-)
This too.
>
> Mark
Kev
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Pneumatic "One Leg at a Time" Robot Circuit
|
| (...) Haha! Yes, I could never have too many trains, but a bigger house would be an advantage since I could run 16 8mm scale trains on a big enough layout. I have a long-term plan for a warehouse full as a museum :-) However, too much concentration (...) (19 years ago, 18-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
