Subject:
|
Whining about studless parts: was Pneumatics book?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic, lugnet.books
|
Date:
|
Sat, 10 Apr 2004 22:49:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
13394 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Steven Lane wrote:
> In lugnet.technic, Mark Bellis wrote:
>
> > The thing is though, 8455s have lots of beams without studs, and ones with studs
> > generally seem to be declining. Perhaps I should build more with the beams from
> > 8455s. The trouble is, using the right angle brackets to make right angles
> > introduces too much flexing into the joints. Beams and plates were much more
> > rigid. Rigidity is essential for efficiency, and efficiency increases speed.
>
> I've long held the opinion that it is a lot harder to make rigid structures
> using studless beams. I have yet to build anything of worth entirely from
> studless, despite multiple attempts.
>
> Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Pneumatics book?
|
| (...) I've long held the opinion that it is a lot harder to make rigid structures using studless beams. I have yet to build anything of worth entirely from studless, despite multiple attempts. Steve (21 years ago, 10-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.books)
|
38 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
