To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / 10815
10814  |  10816
Subject: 
Re: A better full adder!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Thu, 26 Jun 2003 13:37:12 GMT
Viewed: 
1378 times
  
In lugnet.technic, Mark Tarrabain wrote:
I realized this afternoon that I could cull a switch from my earlier
design.  It's now down to 12 switches from 13.  4 switches ganged onto
each piston.

The wiring schematic is here:
http://www.members.shaw.ca/markt1964/fulladder2.jpg

Great job Mark!  Isn't it great when those optimizations just hit you?


Instructions on how to interpret the diagram can be found in an earlier
thread entitled "The latest rage in pneumatic computing".

Mark

Kevin



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: A better full adder!
 
(...) It sure is. Thanks. Using the same pattern (setting up specific switches "backwards"), I can do a half adder with two pistons and 4 switches (2 switches on each piston). Again, no need for inter-piston bracing, just the requirement that a (...) (21 years ago, 26-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  A better full adder!
 
I realized this afternoon that I could cull a switch from my earlier design. It's now down to 12 switches from 13. 4 switches ganged onto each piston. The wiring schematic is here: (URL) on how to interpret the diagram can be found in an earlier (...) (21 years ago, 26-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)

27 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Robotics

 
Contact Recovery Nerd for Speedy USDT / BTC Recovery
13 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR