 | | Re: Need Instruction Scans - Trike Buggy (set 1257 or 3000)
|
|
Thanks! Looks like another LEGO onlnie resource I'm gonna bookmark and visit serveral times. :) (...) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: How real should it be?
|
|
(...) I think we need to remember the original Lego sets that contained these parts. The motors and pneumatics were designed for, and worked well with, the relatively small models built from the Lego instructions. I don't think the Lego designers (...) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
|
|
Do what you can. I think, however, that making one the same size, to fit in the same package, using parts that you approve of as "real technic" is not only possible, but would be a good way to show LEGO how it "should have been". --Jack Gregory (...) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
|
|
<<snip>> (...) In the same scale or can I upsize things a bit? /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: SSPP power suggestion...
|
|
(...) Okay, I see I have to work on this fraise a little: The model must be able to pull the weight for at least 10 cm (3.937 inches). (...) Heh :) /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: How real should it be?
|
|
(...) Ugh, this is so frustrating when it happend. I tried my setup with some weights on the frame but I should have realized how heavy it becomes when everything is in place :( (...) I have servos in most of my MOC's but I only use them to operate (...) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: ID part in Manas 8539
|
|
(...) notice Manas hasn't been inventoried yet. Maybe a good candidate for POTW? ROSCO (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: ID part in Manas 8539
|
|
(...) (URL) feel a bit of a goose. (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Need Instruction Scans - Trike Buggy (set 1257 or 3000)
|
|
There is an instruction scan for this set available here (along with heaps of others): (URL) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | ID part in Manas 8539
|
|
Has this part been discussed? It looks useful. I found it Manas, set 8539. (URL) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Need Instruction Scans - Trike Buggy (set 1257 or 3000)
|
|
Mark Chittenden <mdublade@aol.com> wrote in message news:Gt5vME.DwG@lugnet.com... (...) I (...) Why, are you trying to better my display at; (URL) and (URL) ;) (it can be bettered - I have added another bike since, and know of a few more) (...) I (...) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: How real should it be?
|
|
Hi Tobbe. I know exactly how you feel. In building my CAT 797 frame and steering I geared it down quite slow because I knew the end result would be a heavy model. In real life these trucks don't move very fast anyway. During Christmas I took the (...) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Manas is nifty
|
|
Received a Manas (set 8539) today and I declare it nifty! I look forward to controlling it from the RCX. Menacing the St. Patty's Matoran: (URL) live mayhem (if there is live mayhem to be seen) (URL) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: How real should it be?
|
|
(...) For another way to "read" code, try (URL) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: SSPP power suggestion...
|
|
(...) All you really need the wheels for is friction to stop the entire thing slipping, so you don't really need a "vehicle" at all! Just a static base with your lever! The rules don't specify that it actuall has to be moveable! BTW, there's a fair (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Reply: I know exactly how you feel.
|
|
Hi Tobbe. I know exactly how you feel. In building my CAT 797 frame and steering I geared it down quite slow because I knew the end result would be a heavy model. In real life these trucks don't move very fast anyway. During Christmas I took the (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: How real should it be?
|
|
(...) We're not alone in this universe. Eh. :) (...) I'm a think first, act later person. Meaning I think out a solution and go for it. If it fails at first I give it another go until it works. If it later turns out not to work... Well... (...) Ah, (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: How real should it be?
|
|
(...) :) (...) This plus the recent words of Jennifer helped me so now I'm set with that saying. Thanks, like I said, LEGO do broaden my horizon! (...) So I should run my IPMOC (In Progress MOC) down a slight slope to get it in speed? :) I'll see if (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Technic MOC: Dornier DO-228
|
|
(...) To my supprise not so difficult: The wing actually has a 'skeleton' consisting out of 16 x 1 technic beams in a standard configuration... ehhh... how to explain this in ASCII.... Beam: [OOO...OOO]]OOO...OOO]......... 2x 1/3 height plates: === (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Too much crane?
|
|
"Shiri Dori" <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GsEzyM.280@lugnet.com... (...) Not quite, although they are similar, and you can use that part in this situation, it just isn't very strong. This is the one here: (URL) Hmm... I wouldn't go as (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
