 | | Re: A snow remover machine.
|
|
"Purple Dave" <purpledave@maskofdestiny.com> wrote in message news:Hro195.1q7@lugnet.com... (...) hard (...) the (...) the (...) going to (...) pieces (...) I was probably not clear on this point. I HAVE made a version that just trows the snow (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: HELLO?!, LEGO CO. ! was: Will the educational arm of Technic & Mindstorms continue?
|
|
(...) Probobly the ill-fated Movie Maker set (remember, they had to pay $$$ to Logitec for the camera and also $$$ to Speilberg to use his name) and such like will also disappear. (21 years ago, 18-Jan-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: A snow remover machine.
|
|
(...) (URL) that piece in the four possible different allignments, you can place TECHNIC rotor blades at twelve different angles around the central core of the screw. Unstrengthened stud-only connections don't sound like they're going to be sturdy (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
I've been busy lately, so I wasn't really able to post on this topic earlier, but I feel I have some things to add. First, my opinion is that both studded and studless beams are useful. I have built machines that wouldn't have been possible without (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | A snow remover machine.
|
|
I'm living in a country that has many month of winter trough the year and want to build something that uses some of the resources around me. I'm trying to make a snowblower / motor snowplow that works, but have a hard time making the "screws" that (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Big red 10 wheeled crane on Brickshelf.
|
|
Made by a person named "heikoraack". Thought Lugnet folks might want to see this. (URL) nice to see my favorite kind of wheels (20x30 solid) in a MOC :) (21 years ago, 18-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) The C-3PO, Stormtrooper, and Jango Fett TECHNIC sets all use 1x2 (2-hole) or 1x1 bricks to attach basic LEGO pieces to the otherwise TECHNIC assembly. The R2-D2 set uses a 1-hole 1x2 as a spacer between two assemblies. The closest I can (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) Let me just start out by getting a few things out of the way. I'm not unsympathetic to your view. I also build primarily with BIONICLE parts and stud-free beams, so I realize I might not have much credibility with you. One thing that I'd like (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) I speak only one language, so please don't feel I'm in any way attempting to pick apart your English postings. In fact, I am quite sincerely just trying to make sure that I understand exactly what it is that you are trying to express. It's (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Purpose of part 32072
|
|
"Jindroush" <jindroush@nospam.se...nospam.cz> wrote in message news:40080449.557759...spam.cz... (...) things (...) bevel gear (...) of (...) against. (...) I also wondered why they used this gear in the backhoe-model when I built it the first (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) Don't catch my on my every word, please, I'm not a native speaker so expressing some subtle feelings and so are rather hard for me ;-) I just think of studded beams/holed plates as a 'compatibility layer' between System and Technic. My old 744 (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) This is the same point I made earlier. Building with studless is hard therefore possibly damaging it's appeal to the kids who are supposed to be the market for technic. Adult users of Technic are I think very rare. And how with studless do you (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) Cool. :) It just makes sure we're all on the same page. (...) Actually it was specifically the words, "right to live" that seemed to indicate you felt these parts were dead, gone, deleted, discontinued etc. etc. Once again, this was why I (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) Yes. (...) I should have written 'the studless beams'. (...) Of course, I'm not against the studless beams. I'm against replacement of studded beams with studless in new Technic sets, rendering them incompatible with System. Technic (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) But this complication is unnecessary and doesn't bring anything new/positive. Rather the other things - studless beams are incompatible with System. That's a major issue. They had to design completely new pneumatics for it. We may also see new (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
Hello everybody, (...) True. But then, I have enough studded beams to build whichever way I want. Therefore I welcome the addition of other types of parts to my collection. In fact, LEGO has to come up with new cool parts in new cool models to make (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Purpose of part 32072
|
|
Hello everybody, Others have already elaborated on the advantages of this part, so let me just add a picture taken from the 8455 alternate model for those of you who haven't seen the part in its original application yet: (URL) The primary 8455 (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Part colors?
|
|
Hello everybody, (...) Moreover, some of these blue parts ARE visible on the alternate model: (URL) And IMO they would look better in black or grey, respectively ... Greetings Horst (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) I'm usually more of a lurker here nowadays, but when this topic came up (again), I had to add my 2 cents. Allan, I couldn't agree with you more. Technic is supposed to be more complicated than other lines. To me complicated = more challenging, (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) Jindrich, I also understand both sides of the argument. I see uses for both types of pieces, so I'm not hard core in either direction. (...) Also, I hope you understood my question about what it was you were concerned about. I just wanted to (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
