 | | Re: Centrifugal clutch?
|
|
and the other app deep link (URL) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Centrifugal clutch?
|
|
look here deep link (URL) moderation (URL) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Centrifugal clutch?
|
|
"Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message news:HAAt24.BJz@lugnet.com... (...) i'm sure you do :))))) (...) don't (...) will (...) sometimes when i move the gear stick along the axle it has a lot of friction (some axles are thinner than (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Heavily modified 8880 chassis, succesfully motorised and solar powered.
|
|
(...) Pessimist, huh? ;) Additional lego motors would probably make it go faster, yes, but not much more efficient. Lego motor's efficiency is still rather low compared to the 'high tech' industrial motors, that go up to 90+% efficiency. I'd also (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Centrifugal clutch?
|
|
(...) I'm not sure I follow your English this time pixel? Sure there will be some friction on the pin that the 6641 slide on, but I don't think it will be greater then the centrifugal force. A rubber band that retracts the 6641's is also needed. I (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Centrifugal clutch?
|
|
you are right tobbe but without lubrication it will probably not working cause of force which will work on the weel you talked caouse ther will no balance :((( but the idea is good pixel "Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Centrifugal clutch?
|
|
Pixel gave me an idea in his message about new parts, this part can be used as a weight: (URL) a good one 'cause it slides well on an axle and it has a cross axle hole in the other end thus a small wheel can be attached for greater friction against (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | what else could be done
|
|
hi i've got new lego catalog jan-jul nothing new (in technic field) this makes me thinking what else could be done or even what else should be done what kind of parts lego can do i mean we have pneumatics, flex, gear boxes stuff like this but if (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Heavily modified 8880 chassis, succesfully motorised and solar powered.
|
|
(...) Or you could put in additional LEGO motors to share the power and load. If you buy a non-LEGO motor you will also face the sometimes difficult task of attaching it to LEGO. You might need to glue bricks to the body so it can be attached, the (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Centrifugal clutch?
|
|
(...) make mistakes before :) I'm thinking a large rim, such as the one for the <set:8448> Super Car Mk II, an axle goes through the rim with one stud lenght sticking out on the inside. The outside shaft is attched to what ever needs to be driven. (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Food for MechCat
|
|
(...) Sorry Kevin, I moved things around in my Brickshelf galleries in preparation to putting the instructions on the BI portal. The new locations (after moderation) are: Bird : (URL) : (URL) : (URL) hope people have as much fun building them as I (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: More Speeds in 8448/8466 Gearbox?
|
|
(...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Food for MechCat
|
|
Dean, I'm very interested in looking at your biped bird, but the links don't work. Kevin (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Helicopter rotor in 8856... unrealistic?
|
|
(...) Yep, but 852 only has collective control, and relies on gravity! Ben's has limited cyclic control (nose up/down), and no collective, but that's just a limitation imposed by the original 8444 model - full collective and cyclic could be done (...) (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Helicopter rotor in 8856... unrealistic?
|
|
(...) The rotor design in that set isn't quite right either, though its closer to real life. In the 852, the control stick changes the pitch of the rotor blades, but the pitch angle stays the same as the blades spin around the hub. In a real (...) (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Helicopter rotor in 8856... unrealistic?
|
|
(...) It has already been made by Lego in 1977, 852 Reconnoitre Helicopter. Wonder why they did not do that later on also? /Pehter (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Helicopter rotor in 8856... unrealistic?
|
|
(...) move forwards backwards or sideways. If you tilt the rotor (as is done in these sets) the only thing that happens is that the fusalage of the helecoptor tilts. In a real helecoptor the blades's pitch varies as it rotates around the hub. The (...) (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Heavily modified 8880 chassis, succesfully motorised and solar powered.
|
|
(...) If I want to keep all the features (4wd, gearbox, suspension), which I do, the chassis can't be very much lighter than it is now. Besides, that's just not the direction I want to go. Thing is, I really want to use a better motor. The lego (...) (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Moc: Digger
|
|
(...) Thanks. I wish I had the 851/952 tractor to pull, would have been more right in style. The 8859 has to much of an modern tractor to look right. /Pehter (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.loc.se)
|
| |
| | Re: Heavily modified 8880 chassis, succesfully motorised and solar powered.
|
|
"Gillish" <gillish@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message news:HA920E.E7y@lugnet.com... The lego motor is thinking of going on a strike or even dying (...) heavily. (...) I think it is time to consider a lighter chassis. Your project is getting rather (...) (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
