| |
Bram Lambrecht <braml@juno.com> wrote in message
news:20000117.104043.5095.12.braml@juno.com...
> "Z" <leahy@concentric.net> writes:
> > In lugnet.faq, Ron Atkinson writes:
> > > Is there any reason to keep Lego box?
> >
> > I don't think there's a reason to. The boxes are useless. The LEGO
> > parts are what are useful. I don't know why so many people keep useless
> > LEGO boxes; they're good for keeping the parts in place at the store,
> > but once buy it, the box has served its purpose, and is useless, right?
>
> If the box has reasonably strong walls (eg, a big set like 8880 or 6982)
> I often cut off the flip-top and use the box for sorting/storage. The
> smaller trays from medium size boxes are also good for storage.
> --Bram
>
>
This was exactly what I'm doing till my collection was about 10000-12000
pieces, then it was a must to changed the storage into a stackable drawer
system.
Selçuk
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LEGO box
|
| (...) sorting/storage. (...) I'm at ~35,000 pieces, and the boxes work fine, but then again, there's an entire room in my house pretty much dedicated to LEGO. I have about eight stackable large plastic containers about the size of LEGO tubs, two (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-00, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.storage, lugnet.technic, lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
