Subject:
|
Re: LEGO box
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Tue, 18 Jan 2000 23:58:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1577 times
|
| |
|
|
Frank Filz wrote:
> Selçuk wrote in message ...
> > (1) Toys inside boxes having pictures of women (in lingerie that barely
> > covers their bodies) of top is quite strange, but they are just nicely • sized
> > and strong enough to do job. Hey, "A" in AFOL stands for "adult", isn't
> > it?..:-)
>
> Now I wonder how many people have been embarassed by storing their "adult"
> toys (nudge nudge, wink wink) in LEGO (or any other "kids" toy) boxes? (and
> having a visiting child discover them "um, er, um, that's a very fragile
> toy, why don't you play with this instead...")
Hm, "fragile" would seem like precisely the quality such an object would *not*
possess.
LFB
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LEGO box
|
| Selçuk wrote in message ... (...) sized (...) Now I wonder how many people have been embarassed by storing their "adult" toys (nudge nudge, wink wink) in LEGO (or any other "kids" toy) boxes? (and having a visiting child discover them "um, er, um, (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.storage)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
