To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 6359
6358  |  6360
Subject: 
Re: Vehicle year/building year? (Was: Imperial Guards (was: Re: Sir Steve interviews someone from Lego)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Mon, 28 Feb 2000 20:42:59 GMT
Viewed: 
815 times
  
In article <FqICG1.6E8@lugnet.com>, Jason Catena <catena@xnet.com> wrote:
It's true enough as an observation, since the static architecture (buildings
and the like) has been very minimal in the Star Wars sets to date. I would
guess, though, that children's primary interest (the sets the company wanted to
get out first) were the ones that went "whoosh" when you flew them around the
room. The company probably wanted to attract as much attention as possible to
the line by allowing space battles with your friends, dodging the giant
underwater beastie, etc.

Exactly. It's that, and one other thing:

How many movies do you see the Millenium Falcon in? X-Wing fighters?
TIE fighters?

How many movies do you see the base at Yavin 4 in? And at that, how many
scenes bother to show it? The action was on the space ships, not the
locations. Was the Hoth base worth modelling? Or was it just a place
for C-3PO to whine about Master Luke's chances and Artoo's pitiful
scanner range? Do we really _want_ a Jabba's palace built of 2x1x5
column pieces with neat swively bits like a crane and laser turret from
a Rock Raiders set?

That being said, I suspect we'll see that sort of thing soon enough.
I would bet that as soon as Lego's willing to do Ewok minifigs, we'll
see a forest base to blow up again and again.

While it would be really cool to get a Mos Eisley Cantina set for all
the cool minifigs, does anyone really think it would sell to anyone
who's not an AFOL or collector? Sure, a set with the bounty hunters
would be cool, but how can you do that without building a set that's
the deck of a star destroyer... a most positively boring place.

Until then... hmmm. I'd been wondering what to do with all those white
bricks, maybe I'll build a Hoth base. :)

-JDF
--
J.D. Forinash                                     ,-.
foxtrot@cc.gatech.edu                            ( <
The more you learn, the better your luck gets.    `-'



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Vehicle year/building year? (Was: Imperial Guards (was: Re: Sir Steve interviews someone from Lego)
 
(...) Excellent points...especially about Jabba's palace. I for one don't want Lego to produce anything that relies on juniorized pieces. I'd rather not have (see) any set that will leave me sour over its poor construction, design, parts selection, (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)

Message is in Reply To:
  Vehicle year/building year? (Was: Imperial Guards (was: Re: Sir Steve interviews someone from Lego)
 
In lugnet.starwars, Mike Petrucelli writes: [snip] (...) [snip] Is this an observation or a quote? It's true enough as an observation, since the static architecture (buildings and the like) has been very minimal in the Star Wars sets to date. I (...) (25 years ago, 25-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)

25 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR