Subject:
|
Re: missing boba fett
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 Jan 2000 23:24:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
501 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Jeff Thompson writes:
> In lugnet.starwars, James Beerman writes:
>
> > They'll replace it even though the part was stolen? That would mean anyone
> > could call consumer affairs and get just the figure.
>
> Yeah, it does. But that would be, in effect, stealing. Not just
> stealing from LEGO, but from the entire LEGO community, because, some
> day five years from now, someone may need a replacement Boba Fett
> with the sets long out of production, and if nasty thieves have abused
> LEGO's generosity by asking for "replacement" parts that they aren't
> entitled to, there won't be any Boba Fetts left to get, or, possibly, no
> more LEGO Consumer Affairs at all.
>
> > Or do they require you
> > to send the receipt?
>
> Not when I've dealt with them. But it would be within their
> rights to demand some sort of proof of purchase.
I had a R2-D2 with smudged printing when the SW first came out last year. I
called to get a replacement, they asked me to return it to them before they
sent me a new one. Maybe I had to return it because it was defective rather
than missing, but my guess at the time was that it was Star Wars piece and
they were keeping a tighter control on replacement parts and were not as
likely to just send out parts, particular figs, without proof of ownership.
Ben Gatrelle
(remove the spam dot from the yellowcastle to reply.)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: missing boba fett
|
| (...) Yeah, it does. But that would be, in effect, stealing. Not just stealing from LEGO, but from the entire LEGO community, because, some day five years from now, someone may need a replacement Boba Fett with the sets long out of production, and (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
