 | | Re: New Star Wars Stuff —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | (...) The minifig under the lightsaber appears to be Han Solo. I'm really amazed by these sets, even with the small size of the pictures. <speculation> The Falcon seems pretty hefty. The front mandibles look to be the new x-wing style wings with (...) (25 years ago, 7-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New Star Wars Stuff —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | | (...) I wouldn't say that. If TLG was to produce the Millenium Falcon in it's proper size, it would be a far too large set to sell. (Ok, so I know that a lot of people around here would buy it, but for most kids it would be too large.) LEGO usually (...) (25 years ago, 7-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New Star Wars Stuff —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | (...) I'd have to agree... also, bear in mind that a Falcon the size of an X-Wing is still a lot bigger than the X-Wing just in terms of pieces, etc., since it's a lot more bulky, and doesn't have real 'wings' or a thin body... But usually, the toy (...) (25 years ago, 7-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New Star Wars Stuff —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | | | (...) From what I can tell, the Gungan Sub is *WAY* bigger than it "should" be. eric (25 years ago, 7-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New Star Wars Stuff —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | | | | (...) Yes, and the cockpit is one part, not three distinct ones. Good for parts, poor representation of what it was in the movie. :( (25 years ago, 7-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New Star Wars Stuff —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | | | (...) I don't think I would say that. The Gungan Sub is terribly misconfigured as to the version in the Movie which had all 3 characters in one compartment with 2 "Cargo compartments" on either side. I personally think that this model was the 2nd (...) (25 years ago, 7-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New Star Wars Stuff —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | | | (...) While that is of course true, it still looks ousized to me. If you take a standard minifig as being ~6 feet tall, and look at how big the model is, and compare it to the sketches in the Episode One Amazing Cut-Aways book... it's huge. Roughly (...) (25 years ago, 7-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New Star Wars Stuff —Paul Mison
|
| | | | | (...) That would have been an unforgivable error were it not for the fact I like Lego more than Star Wars. Whoops. Maybe I should go back to lurking here and dreaming of grey bricks.... (...) same here :: paul (25 years ago, 7-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New Star Wars Stuff —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | | Christopher Tracey <ctracey@usgs.gov> wrote in message news:37FCA7F0.EDD9A5...sgs.gov... (...) by (...) x-wing (...) front (...) studs (...) wide. (...) front (...) If it (...) of (...) much (...) impressions of (...) More speculation: Where's the (...) (25 years ago, 7-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New Star Wars Stuff —Matthew Julius
|
| | | | (...) Even heftier than you think unless I've missed my guess. (...) Okay, lacking other evidence I'll agree with you there. (...) It's 8 studs I think. If you take either mandible tip to be 3 studs wide then the depth of the cutout between them is (...) (25 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
