Subject:
|
Re: Just a question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Wed, 2 Jun 1999 02:54:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
707 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999 22:25:15 GMT, D Blomberg <blomberg@netscape.net> wrote:
> What I think is even more strange, is why do they model high
> tech armored vehicles after bipeds and quadripeds? They have spacecraft
> that can take off vertically, hover, and travel at light speed
> yet they have Imperial Walkers? Little furry, aboriginal ewoks
> can take these things down with vines and logs.
Fear and intimidation. An AT-AT would have a great psychological impact.
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Just a question
|
| (...) That's the explanation I've heard too. However, I'm less inclined than Lucas and Co. to allow that Snowspeeder cables and vines can bring down AT-ATs or AT-STs respectively. The logs, on the other hand, are part of guerilla warfare--and (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Just a question
|
| What I think is even more strange, is why do they model high tech armored vehicles after bipeds and quadripeds? They have spacecraft that can take off vertically, hover, and travel at light speed yet they have Imperial Walkers? Little furry, (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
